不同生育期土壤-苜蓿系统水流阻力和水容变化规律研究

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2009.05.007

›› 2009, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (5): 575-580.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2009.05.007

不同生育期土壤-苜蓿系统水流阻力和水容变化规律研究

付微^1,2, 黄明斌¹, 邵明安¹

1. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 西北农林科技大学, 陕西, 杨凌, 712100;
2. 中国科学院研究生院, 北京, 100049

收稿日期:2009-04-17 修回日期:2009-07-16 出版日期:2009-10-15 发布日期:2009-10-15
通讯作者: 黄明斌,E-mail:hmbd@nwsuaf.edu.cn
作者简介:付微(1979- ),女,辽宁盘锦人,博士研究生,研究方向为土壤物理和生态水文,E-mail:annefwd@sina.com.cn
基金资助:
国家“973计划”项目(2007CB407201);中国科学院、国家外国专家局创新团队国际合作伙伴计划-流域水土过程模拟

Dynamical Changes of Hydraulic Resistance and Capacitance in the Soil-alfalfa System at Different Growth Stages

FU Wei^1,2, HUANG Ming-bin¹, SHAO Ming-an¹

1. The State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, CAS&MWR, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China;
2. Graduate School, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2009-04-17 Revised:2009-07-16 Online:2009-10-15 Published:2009-10-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 紫花苜蓿是水蚀风蚀交错带重要的人工种植牧草,具有较强的耐寒、耐旱性。自然条件下的模拟土柱试验在陕北神木试验站进行,采用抑制蒸腾法定量分析了水蚀风蚀交错带土壤-苜蓿系统水流阻力、水容等瞬态水流参数变化过程。结果表明:不同生育期内瞬态水流阻力及水容有明显差异:开花旺盛期平均水流阻力最小0.22×10⁸Mpa.s.m^-3,约为干枯老化期的1/9;平均水容最大5.38×10^-4m³/Mpa;是现蕾期的4倍多。该研究结果有助于揭示紫花苜蓿体内水分调节作用及抗旱机制,对干旱半干旱地区植被恢复有重要指导意义。

关键词: 水蚀风蚀交错带, 苜蓿, 水流阻力, 水容

Abstract: Alfalfa(Medicago Sativa L.) is one of the dominant sown forages with the characteristics of strong tolerance to cold and drought in the interleaving region of wind and water erosions of the Loess Plateau.A simulating experiment of alfalfa planted in soil columns with different water treatments was conducted under the natural conditions at Shenmu Experimental Station,Shaanxi province and the dynamical changes of hydraulic resistance and capacity in the soil-alfalfa system was quantitatively calculated using transient water flow model of the transpiration-preventing method.The results show that hydraulic resistance and capacitance varied with growing seasons.The mean hydraulic resistance at flowering stage was minimum at 0.22×10⁸ Mpa.s.m^-3,which was about 1/9 lower than that at senescent stage,and the mean hydraulic capacitance was maximum at 5.38×10^-4 m³/Mpa,which was four times higher than that at squaring stage.The results could help further understand the mechanism of water regulation and drought resistance of alfalfa and be useful for revegetation practice in the arid and semi-arid areas.

Key words: Wind-water erosion interleaving region, Medicago sativa L., Hydraulic resistance, Hydraulic capacitance

中图分类号:

Q948.118

付微, 黄明斌, 邵明安. 不同生育期土壤-苜蓿系统水流阻力和水容变化规律研究[J]. , 2009, 17(5): 575-580.

FU Wei, HUANG Ming-bin, SHAO Ming-an. Dynamical Changes of Hydraulic Resistance and Capacitance in the Soil-alfalfa System at Different Growth Stages[J]. , 2009, 17(5): 575-580.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2009.05.007

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2009/V17/I5/575

参考文献

[1] 唐克丽.黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错区治理的重要性与紧迫性[J].中国水土保持,2000,11:11-13
[2] 成向荣,黄明斌,邵明安,等.紫花苜蓿和短花针茅根系分布与土壤水分研究[J].草地学报,2008,16(2):170-175
[3] Sperry J S,Meinzer F C,Mcculloh K A.Safety and efficiency conflicts in hydraulic architecture:scaling from tissues to trees[J].Plant,Cell and Environment,2008,31:632-645
[4] 邵明安.土壤-植物系统中的水容研究[J].水利学报,1992,6(6):1-8
[5] 邵明安,康绍忠,蔡焕杰.预报植物叶水势的阻-容网络法[J].水土保持研究,1991,6(6):75-82
[6] Nobel P S,Jordan P W.Transpiration stream of desert species:resistances and capacitances for a C3,a C4 and a CAM plant[J].Journal of Experimental Botany,1983,10(34):1379-1391
[7] 黄明斌,张富仓,康绍忠.瞬变条件下土壤-植物系统中水容效应及其应用研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,1999,17(1):45-49
[8] Wallace J S,Biscoe P V.Water relations of winter wheat 4.Hydraulic resistance and capacitance in the soil-plant system[J].J.of Agric.Sci.,Cambridge,1983,100:591-600
[9] Turner N C,Long M J.Errors arising from Rapid Water Loss in the Measurement of Leaf Water Potential by the Pressure Chamber Technique[J].Aust.J.Plant Physiol.,1980,7:527-537
[10] 黄明斌,邵明安.土壤-植物系统中非稳态流研究进展[J].土壤学进展,1994,22(3):20-26
[11] Shao M.On time constant variability of electric analogy of water flow in soil-plant system[J].Chinese Science Bulletin,1992,37(14):1208-1211
[12] Running S W,Federer C A.Extrapolating plant water flow resistances and capacitances to regional scales[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,1991,54:169-195
[13] Jones J W,Zur B,Booto K J,Hammond L C.Plant resistance to water flow in field soybeans:I.Non limiting soil moisture[J].Agronomy J.,1982,74:92-98
[14] Goldstein G,Meinzer F C,Monasterio M.The role of capacitance in the water balance of Andean giant rosette species[J].Plant,Cell and Environment,1984,7:179-186
[15] Nulsen R A,Thurtell G W.Recovery of Corn Leaf Water Potential after Severe Water Stress[J].Agronomy J.,1978,70:903-906
[16] Van den Honert T H.Water transport in plants as a catenary process.Discussion of the Faraday Soc.,1948,3:146-153
[17] 黄明斌,邵明安.不同有效土壤水势下植物叶水势与蒸腾速率的关系[J].水利学报,1996,3:1-6
[18] 徐炳成,山仑.苜蓿和沙打旺苗期需水及其根冠比[J].草地学报,2003,11(1):78-82

不同生育期土壤-苜蓿系统水流阻力和水容变化规律研究

Dynamical Changes of Hydraulic Resistance and Capacitance in the Soil-alfalfa System at Different Growth Stages

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王静, 刘晓静, 程甜甜, 童长春, 汪雪. 不同氮效率紫花苜蓿叶特征及其产量效应研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1941-1949.
[2]	孟宣辰, 马鹏程, 马杰, 段珍, 韩阳阳, 张吉宇. 黄土高原半干旱区紫花苜蓿覆膜垄沟和施肥效应研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2098-2106.
[3]	孙伟, 刘玉玲, 王德平, 赵敏, 杨合龙, 宋倩, 肖红, 王开丽, 曹婧, 戎郁萍. 补播羊草和黄花苜蓿对退化草甸植物群落特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1809-1817.
[4]	陈雷, 暴雪艳, 郭刚, 霍文婕, 李清宏, 许庆方, 王聪, 刘强. 单宁酸和乳酸菌对紫花苜蓿青贮品质和体外瘤胃发酵的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1853-1858.
[5]	李春萍, 邱轶辉, 夏厚胤, 谭璐娜, 许环宇, 张瀚文, 高景慧. 紫花苜蓿多父本F₁代低蒸腾及产量性状的隶属函数分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1416-1422.
[6]	李天琦, 林志玲, 卢轩, 黄佳媛, 杨宁, 沃野, 高凯, 柳小妮, 王显国. 灌溉量对科尔沁沙地紫花苜蓿土壤速效养分分布及淋失的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1454-1461.
[7]	李红, 李波, 方志坚, 杨曌, 张超, 冯成龙, 金姗姗, 王思琦, 石婉莹. 冻融和冻融+苏打盐碱复合胁迫下苜蓿幼苗的生理响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1469-1476.
[8]	李鹏珍, 赵得琴, 邓波, 杨军, 赵国华, 赵亮. 生物炭与干旱胁迫对接种紫花苜蓿光合效率及生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1257-1264.
[9]	王文静, 麻冬梅, 赵丽娟, 马巧利. 2,4-表油菜素内酯对盐胁迫下紫花苜蓿生理指标及根系离子积累的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1363-1368.
[10]	潘新怡, 史昆, 龚攀, 韦宝, 吴欣明, 王赞. 紫花苜蓿花青苷合成的转录组分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 866-875.
[11]	孙雷雷, 赵桂琴, 柴继宽, 刘富渊, 聂秀美, 王军. 贮藏方式和贮藏时间对苜蓿干草霉菌数量和种类的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 884-893.
[12]	陈彩锦, 张尚沛, 师尚礼, 曾燕霞, 吴娟, 尚继红, 高婷, 张蓉. 基于GGE双标图对苜蓿品种丰产性和稳定性综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 912-918.
[13]	黄荣, 姚博, 张玉娟, 贾倩英, 李向阳, 张宏, 张振粉. 成团泛菌CQ10脂多糖对紫花苜蓿种子萌发及苗期生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 965-971.
[14]	陈卫东, 张玉霞, 丛百明, 阿玛尔, 田永雷, 张庆昕, 杜晓艳. 钾肥对紫花苜蓿根颈丙二醛、可溶性蛋白含量与抗氧化系统的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 717-723.
[15]	徐洪雨, 甄莉丽, 李钰莹, 董宽虎, 李向林. 低温干旱环境对紫花苜蓿根颈耐寒性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 724-733.