添加剂对西藏青饲玉米和青稞秸秆混合青贮发酵品质的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.02.028

草地学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (2): 401-406.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.02.028

添加剂对西藏青饲玉米和青稞秸秆混合青贮发酵品质的影响

李龙兴^1,4, 郭刚^1,2, 原现军¹, 闻爱友¹, 王坚¹, 参木有³, 陈裕祥³, 邵涛¹

1. 南京农业大学动物科学技术学院饲草调制加工与贮藏研究所, 江苏南京 210095;
2. 山西农业大学动物科学技术学院, 山西太谷 0308012;
3. 西藏自治区农牧科学院畜牧兽医科学研究所, 西藏拉萨 850003;
4. 贵州省草地技术试验推广站, 贵州贵阳 550025

收稿日期:2014-04-14 修回日期:2014-07-03 出版日期:2015-04-15 发布日期:2015-03-25
通讯作者: 邵涛
作者简介:李龙兴(1986-),男,陕西汉中人,硕士研究生,主要从事饲草调制与加工研究,E-mail:lilongxing3110@163.com
基金资助:
公益性行业(农业)科研专项经费项目“牧区优质高效饲草生产利用技术研究与示范”;“十二五”国家科技支撑计划“藏北退化草地综合整治技术与示范” (2011BAC09B03);中国科学院西藏区域创新平台建设项目“促进农牧民增收的西藏农牧结合技术体系构建与示范”资助

Effects of Additives on the Fermentation Quality of Mixed Silage of Forage Maize and Hullessbarley Straw in Tibet

LI Long-xing^1,4, GUO Gang^1,2, YUAN Xian-jun¹, WEN Ai-you¹, WANG Jian¹, CAN Mu-you³, CHEN Yu-xiang³, SHAO Tao¹

1. Institute of Ensiling and Processing of Grass, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province 210095, China;
2. College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi Province 030801, China;
3. Tibet agriculture and animal husbandry academy of sciences institute of animal husbandry and veterinary science, lasa, Tibet 850003, China;
4. Guizhou grass technology extending stations, Guiyang, Guizhou Province 550006, China

Received:2014-04-14 Revised:2014-07-03 Online:2015-04-15 Published:2015-03-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探讨酶和乳酸菌制剂对西藏地区青稞(Hordeum vulgare)秸秆与青饲玉米(Zea mays)混合青贮(35%:65%)发酵品质的影响,试验分别设对照组(C)、酶制剂(E)、乳酸菌制剂(LAB)和酶+乳酸菌制剂(E+LAB)4个处理组.青贮后第15,30和45 d开窖取样,测定青贮饲料发酵品质.结果表明:添加酶或乳酸菌制剂在一定程度上改善了青贮饲料的发酵品质,与对照组相比,添加剂处理组青贮饲料的pH和氨态氮/总氮值降低,乳酸和水溶性碳水化合物含量提高;对照组和E处理组中乙酸含量和总挥发性脂肪酸含量显著高于LAB和E+LAB处理组,而酶和乳酸菌组合添加进一步提高乳酸和水溶性碳水化合物含量,表明酶和乳酸菌组合添加比二者单独添加效果更显著.

关键词: 青稞秸秆, 青饲玉米, 混合青贮, 添加剂, 发酵品质

Abstract:

The effects of adding cornzyme and lactic acid bacteria on the fermentation quality of mixed ensilage of hulless barley (Hordeum vulgare) straw and forage maize(Zea mays)during ensiling were studied here. The treatments were as follows: control ; cornzyme (E) ; lactic acid bacteria(LAB); cornzyme and lactic acid bacteria(E+LAB). The silos were opened on 15, 30 and 45th days after ensiling and the fermentation quality was analyzed. The results showed that the addition of cornzyme or lactic acid bacteria could improve the fermentation quality of mixed silage. The pH values and ammonia nitrogen/total nitrogen ratios of adding treatments were lower than that of control, while the contents of lactic acid and water soluble carbohydrates were higher than that of control. The acetic acid and total VFA contents of control and E were significantly higher than that of LAB and E+LAB (P <0.05), while the addition of cornzyme and lactic acid bacteria could increase the contents of lactic acid and water soluble carbohydrates indicating that the effect of adding E+LAB was more significant than that of adding E or LAB alone.

Key words: Hullessbarley straw, Forage maize, Mixed ensilage, Additives, Fermentation quality

中图分类号:

S816.53

李龙兴, 郭刚, 原现军, 闻爱友, 王坚, 参木有, 陈裕祥, 邵涛. 添加剂对西藏青饲玉米和青稞秸秆混合青贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(2): 401-406.

LI Long-xing, GUO Gang, YUAN Xian-jun, WEN Ai-you, WANG Jian, CAN Mu-you, CHEN Yu-xiang, SHAO Tao. Effects of Additives on the Fermentation Quality of Mixed Silage of Forage Maize and Hullessbarley Straw in Tibet[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2015, 23(2): 401-406.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.02.028

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2015/V23/I2/401

参考文献

[1] 苏大学. 西藏草地畜牧业发展战略的调整[J]. 草地学报,2005,13(S1):44-47
[2] McDonald P, Henderson A, Heron S J E. The Biochemistry of Silage (2th ed) [M]. Chalcombe Publications, Marlow,UK,1991
[3] 张增欣,邵涛. 青贮添加剂研究进展[J]. 草业科学,2006(9):56-63
[4] 席兴军,韩鲁佳,原慎一郎,等. 添加乳酸菌和纤维素酶对玉米秸秆青贮饲料品质的影响[J].中国农业大学学报,2003(2):21-24
[5] 李龙兴. 西藏主要农作物秸秆与牧草混合青贮的研究[D]. 南京:南京农业大学,2013:12
[6] Shao T, Shimojo M, Wang T, et al. Effect of additives on the fermentation quality and residual mono-and di-saccharides compositions of Forage Oats (Avena sativa L.) and Italian Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) silages [J]. Asian-AustralasianAsian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences,2005,18(11):1582-1588
[7] 郭艳萍,玉柱,顾雪莹. 不同添加剂对高粱青贮质量的影响[J]. 草地学报,2010,18(6):739-745
[8] Shao T. Fermentation quality of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) silages treated with encapsulated-glucose,glucose,sorbic acid and pre-fermented juices [J]. Asian-Autralasian Association of Animal Production Societies,2007,20(11):1699-1704
[9] Ridla M, Uchidaz S. Effects of combined treatment of lactic acid bacteria and cell wall degrading enzymes on fermentation and composition of rhodesgrass [J]. Cellulose,1998,11(5):522-529
[10] Weinberg Z, Ashbell G, Hen Y, et al. Ensiling whole-crop wheat and corn in large containers with Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus buchneri [J]. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology,2002,28(1):7-11
[11] 许庆方,崔志文,魏化敬,等. 不同添加剂对小黑麦青贮饲料品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2009,17(4):195-202
[12] Aksu T, Baytok E, Bolat D. Effects of a bacterial silage inoculant on corn silage fermentation and nutrient digestibility [J]. Small Ruminant Research,2004,55(1/3):249-252
[13] 原现军,余成群,李志华,等. 西藏青稞秸秆与多年生黑麦草混合青贮发酵品质的研究[J]. 草业学报,2012,21 (4):325-330
[14] Bytok E. The Effects of Formic Acid, Molasses and Inoculant as Silage Additives on Corn Silage Composition and Ruminal Fermentation Characteristics in Sheep [J]. Turk Journal Veterinarian Animal Science,2005,29(1):469-474
[15] 王奇,余成群,辛鹏程,等. 苇状羊茅和箭筈豌豆混合青贮发酵品质的研究[J]. 草地学报,2012,20(5):952-956
[16] Shao T, Ohba N, Shimojo M, et al. Effects of addition of glucose and sorbic acid on the fermentation quality of guineagrass (Panicum maximum Jacq.) silages [J]. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture Kyushu University,2003,47(2):351-358
[17] Rooke J. The numbers of epiphytic bacteria on grass at ensilage on commercial farms [J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1990,51(4):525-533

添加剂对西藏青饲玉米和青稞秸秆混合青贮发酵品质的影响

Effects of Additives on the Fermentation Quality of Mixed Silage of Forage Maize and Hullessbarley Straw in Tibet

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吕竑建, 邹璇, 吴硕, 李云, 陈晓阳, 张庆. 添加辣木叶和香肠乳杆菌对玉米秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1343-1349.
[2]	秦伟娜, 焦婷, 师尚礼, 李雄雄, 高雪梅, 赵生国, 祁娟, 王正文. 不同水热资源条件下10个青饲玉米品种的青贮品质评价[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1070-1079.
[3]	王新宇, 申晨, 霍文婕, 刘强, 张拴林, 王聪, 陈雷, 许庆方, 王永新, 郭刚. 雁北地区不同品种玉米全株青贮发酵品质及细菌群落结构分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1087-1093.
[4]	尤思涵, 都帅, 周忠义, 格根图, 宛涛, 贾玉山. 高丹草与黑麦草适宜混贮比例研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 821-827.
[5]	侯红雁, 申晨, 霍文婕, 刘强, 张拴林, 王聪, 陈雷, 许庆方, 王永新, 王忠豪, 郭刚. 同型发酵乳杆菌对低水分紫花苜蓿青贮发酵品质及体外消化率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 835-841.
[6]	陆永祥, 严显明, 周朝相, 朱会先, 苟文龙, 游明鸿, 李达旭, 陈仕勇, 李平, 白史且. 不同添加剂对高水分全株玉米青贮饲料发酵品质和细菌群落的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 842-847.
[7]	路平乐, 魏玉明, 杨发荣, 江小帆, 李倩, 赵生国, 蔡原, 焦婷. 体外产气法评价全株藜麦与全株玉米混合青贮饲料饲用价值[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2391-2398.
[8]	丁浩, 吴永杰, 邵涛, 赵杰, 代童童, 董东, 尹雪敬, 贾玉山, 李君风. 纤维素酶和木聚糖酶对象草青贮发酵品质及体外消化率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2600-2608.
[9]	陆永祥, 赵嫚, 陈良寅, 成启明, 游明鸿, 李达旭, 陈仕勇, 白史且, 李平. 布氏乳杆菌和甲酸对青藏高原不同物候期燕麦青贮饲料发酵品质和细菌群落的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1736-1743.
[10]	朱九刚, 张健, 邵涛, 董志浩, 李君风, 唐露, 冉启凡, 刘秦华. 添加剂对全株燕麦青贮饲料发酵品质和有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1756-1761.
[11]	高雪梅, 焦婷, 雷赵民, 冉福, 赵生国. 添加剂对汽爆玉米秸秆养分和发酵特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(4): 1129-1135.
[12]	梁龙飞, 王飞, 董祥, 郝俊. ‘热研4号’王草替代紫花苜蓿对TMR发酵品质及有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(3): 703-711.
[13]	陆永祥, 成启明, 陈良寅, 孙林, 肖冰雪, 苟文龙, 游明鸿, 白史且, 李平. 不同海拔的燕麦青贮饲料发酵品质和细菌群落特征[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(2): 350-357.
[14]	李龙兴, 汪依妮, 杨学东, 黎俊, 龚正发, 弗雷泽·乔治·哈里森, 陈秀华, 黄文琥, 梁显义. 凋萎和添加乳酸菌对大黑山薏苡青贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(4): 1102-1106.
[15]	穆麟, 李顺, 曾宁波, 陈桂华, 张志飞, 叶志刚. 添加糖蜜、乳酸菌制剂对籽粒苋与稻秸混合青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(2): 482-487.