不同天气条件下授粉蜂类驱动的紫花苜蓿花粉空气传播

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.12.003

草地学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12): 3680-3687.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.12.003

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

不同天气条件下授粉蜂类驱动的紫花苜蓿花粉空气传播

陈敏, 吴慧珍, 闵学阳, 严学兵, 张传杰

扬州大学动物科学与技术学院草业科学系, 江苏扬州 225009

收稿日期:2024-05-20 修回日期:2024-06-24 发布日期:2024-12-14
通讯作者: 张传杰,E-mail:chuanjiezhang@yzu.edu.cn
作者简介:陈敏(2000-),女,汉族,安徽庐江人,硕士研究生,主要从事牧草种质评价与遗传育种研究,E-mail:cmxzpaxl@163.com;
基金资助:
扬州大学研究生科研与实践创新计划资助项目(KYCX23_3615)；国家自然科学基金面上(32171670)资助

Pollen Release and Dispersal Patterns of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) Driven by Pollinating Bee under Different Weather Conditions

CHEN Min, WU Hui-Zhen, MIN Xue-yang, YAN Xue-bing, ZHANG Chuan-Jie

Department of Grassland Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province 225009, China

Received:2024-05-20 Revised:2024-06-24 Published:2024-12-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)品种间的花粉漂移，对苜蓿的制种具有重要影响；且其潜在的生态、进化学效应引起学者担忧。本试验利用Rotorod花粉收集器探究不同天气条件下不同蜂类驱动的苜蓿花粉释放和扩散规律。结果表明：不论意大利蜜蜂或熊蜂，它们引起的花粉释放模式为随日时间变化花粉浓度先增后减，即从8:00(约30 pollens·m^-3·h^-1)到13:00(约1100 pollens·m^-3·h^-1)浓度逐渐增加(13:00达到峰值)，之后降低；苜蓿花粉扩散随距离增加浓度减小且浓度大小具有方向性倾向。本试验条件下，苜蓿花粉最大扩散距离为18 m。相较于意蜂，熊蜂更能适应不同天气条件，尤其是高气压、强风天气。本研究结果有助于加深对苜蓿花粉介导的基因漂移的认识，为制定限制花粉漂移策略及科学利用蜂类授粉提供参考。

关键词: 紫花苜蓿, 花粉扩散, 空气动力学, 意大利蜜蜂, 熊蜂

Abstract: Pollen flow between alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) cultivars has raised great concerns due to its potential impacts on alfalfa seed production and ecological and evolutionary effects. This study was conducted to explore the pollen release and dispersal patterns of alfalfa that was driven by pollinating bees under different weather conditions (buoyant turbulent or pressure-driven nonturbulent conditions) using the Rotorod pollen collector. The results showed that regardless of honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) or bumblebee (Bombus terrestris L.), the pollen release pattern of alfalfa driven by pollinating bees initially increased from the morning at 8:00 (about 30 pollens·m^-3·h^-1) to the noon at 13:00 (about 1100 pollens·m^-3·h^-1) (reaching the peak at 13:00), and decreased subsequently. The concentration of alfalfa pollen dispersed from the pollen source decreased with increasing the distance from the pollen source edge. The directional effect on pollen concentration out of the pollen source was showed. Under the present experimental conditions, the potential distance of pollen dispersal from pollen source was 18 m. Additionally, compared to honeybees, bumblebees are better adapted to the different weather conditions, especially the pressure-driven nonturbulent conditions. In summary, the results in this study would be helpful for better understanding the pollen-mediated pollen flow, developing strategies to limit the pollen flow, and thus providing the valuable reference for proper using of different pollinating bees in alfalfa.

Key words: Alfalfa, Pollen dispersal, Aerodynamics, Italian bee, Bumblebee

中图分类号:

S541.9

陈敏, 吴慧珍, 闵学阳, 严学兵, 张传杰. 不同天气条件下授粉蜂类驱动的紫花苜蓿花粉空气传播[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(12): 3680-3687.

CHEN Min, WU Hui-Zhen, MIN Xue-yang, YAN Xue-bing, ZHANG Chuan-Jie. Pollen Release and Dispersal Patterns of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) Driven by Pollinating Bee under Different Weather Conditions[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(12): 3680-3687.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.12.003

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2024/V32/I12/3680

参考文献

[1] 贾先岩. 转基因紫花苜蓿抗逆性研究进展[J]. 青海农林科技, 2018(3):60-63
[2] 智研咨询. 2025-2031年中国苜蓿草行业市场专项调研及发展策略分析报告[EB/OL]. https://www.chyxx.com/research/202110/977337.html, 2024-12-05/2024-12-06
[3] 孙启忠, 玉柱, 徐春城. 我国苜蓿产业亟待振兴[J]. 草业科学, 2012, 29(2):314-319
[4] YI D X, MA L, LIN M, et al. Development of glyphosate-resistant alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) upon transformation with the GR79Ms gene encoding 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase[J]. Planta, 2018, 248(1):211-219
[5] 金太成, 刘雨晴, 许亚男, 等. 农杆菌介导的苜蓿遗传转化及PDH45转基因苜蓿耐盐性[J].分子植物育种, 2018, 16(10):3190-3195
[6] 王之杰, 李明序, 张万军. 根癌农杆菌介导的紫花苜蓿遗传转化体系的优化[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(6):1665-1671
[7] 匡倩, 宗亚倩, 杨文, 等. 空间诱变对'德钦’紫花苜蓿农艺性状和营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(6):1962-1967
[8] ANDOW D A, ZWAHLEN C. Assessing environmental risks of transgenic plants[J]. Ecology Letters, 2006, 9(2):196-214
[9] CARON D M. Insect pollination of cultivated crop plants[J]. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America, 1977, 23(1):104
[10] PALMER-JONES T, FORSTER I W. Observations on the pollination of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.)[J]. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 1965, 8(2):340-349
[11] 宋卓琴, 郭媛, 高磊, 等. 不同蜂种为紫花苜蓿授粉的行为与效果研究[J]. 山西农业科学, 2017, 45(11):1856-1858
[12] 武敏, 张旭凤, 张云毅, 等. 意大利蜜蜂和苜蓿切叶蜂为紫花苜蓿授粉访花行为比较[J]. 中国蜂业, 2020, 71(12):72-74
[13] ZHANG C J, GAO Y, KIM D S, et al. Bumblebees are more efficient than honeybees to facilitate wind-blown pollen dispersal of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2022, 340:108161
[14] 刘红平, 金樑, 王晓娟. 苜蓿与传粉昆虫的互作[J]. 草业科学, 2008, 25(3):56-60
[15] HAEDO J P, MARTÍNEZ L C, GRAFFIGNA S, et al. Managed and wild bees contribute to alfalfa (Medicago sativa) pollination[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2022, 324:107711
[16] RAUF A, SAEED S, ALI M, et al. Comparative efficiency of native insect pollinators in reproductive performance of Medicago sativa L. in Pakistan[J]. Insects, 2021, 12(11):1029
[17] 侯建荣, 李天银, 郭长辉, 等. 玉门地区紫花苜蓿种子田传粉昆虫种类调查研究[J]. 草学, 2021(2):45-50
[18] TAHA E A, AL-ABDULSALAM M, AL-KAHTANI S. Insect pollinators and foraging behavior of honey bees on alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) in Saudi Arabia[J]. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 2016, 89(1):92-99
[19] BRUNET J, STEWART C M. Impact of bee species and plant density on alfalfa pollination and potential for gene flow[J]. Psyche:A Journal of Entomology, 2010, 2010:201858
[20] SANTA-MARTINEZ E, CARDOSO CASTRO C C, FLICK A, et al. Bee species visiting Medicago sativa differ in pollen deposition curves with consequences for gene flow[J]. American Journal of Botany, 2021, 108(6):1016-1028
[21] ZHANG C J, YOOK M J, PARK H R, et al. Evaluation of maximum potential gene flow from herbicide resistant Brassica napus to its male sterile relatives under open and wind pollination conditions[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 634:821-830
[22] ZHANG C J, YOOK M J, PARK H R, et al. Assessment of potential environmental risks of transgene flow in smallholder farming systems in Asia:Brassica napus as a case study in Korea[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 640-641:688-695
[23] HOYLE M, HAYTER K, CRESSWELL J E. Effect of pollinator abundance on self-fertilization and gene flow:application to GM canola[J]. Ecological Applications, 2007, 17:2123-2135
[24] RONG J, LU B R, SONG Z P. Dramatic reduction of crop-to-crop gene flow within a short distance from transgenic rice fields[J]. New Phytologist, 2007, 173(2):346-353
[25] 吴光安, 尹园园, 陈浩, 等. 地熊蜂和意大利蜜蜂为设施蓝莓授粉效果比较研究[J]. 中国蜂业, 2019, 70(9):68-70
[26] 黄训兵, 李辉, 陈浩, 等. 熊蜂授粉对北方冬季温室不同品种番茄品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2022(4):56-61
[27] 郭媛, 宋卓琴, 张旭凤, 等. 西方蜜蜂和地熊蜂为紫花苜蓿授粉效果比较[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2017, 54(6):1008-1014
[28] GOGGI A S, LOPEZ-SANCHEZ H, CARAGEA P, et al. Gene flow in maize fields with different local pollen densities[J]. International Journal of Biometeorology, 2007, 51(6):493-503
[29] CHEN L J, LEE D S, SONG Z P, et al. Gene flow from cultivated rice (Oryza sativa) to its weedy and wild relatives[J]. Annals of Botany, 2004, 93(1):67-73
[30] RIEBEN S, KALININA O, SCHMID B, et al. Gene flow in genetically modified wheat[J]. Plos One, 2011, 6(12):e29730

不同天气条件下授粉蜂类驱动的紫花苜蓿花粉空气传播

Pollen Release and Dispersal Patterns of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) Driven by Pollinating Bee under Different Weather Conditions

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	武欣, 张芮, 李妙祺, 张小艳, 张真荣, 卢小波. 紫花苜蓿亏缺灌溉栽培的综合管理策略研究[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(9): 2677-2685.
[2]	贾雪, 蔡回彩, 于澜, 李沛, 徐博. 紫花苜蓿不育系与保持系线粒体全基因组比较分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(9): 2737-2748.
[3]	苏小港, 额尔德木图, 成蓉蓉, 陈艳红, 巩泽琳, 张晓琳, 翟鹏辉. 增水和施肥对苜蓿-小麦轮作系统冬小麦叶片水分利用效率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(9): 2891-2898.
[4]	陈辰, 滑少波, 李杰勤, 姜华, 黄鹤平, 姜婉琦, 姚敏学, 李向飞, 初晓辉, 刘秦华. 紫花苜蓿青贮饲料对草鱼生长性能和肌肉品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(9): 2990-2998.
[5]	马晓璇, 梁程博, 刘道鑫, 孙国, 闫京艳. 西氏熊蜂线粒体基因组结构特征及系统发育分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(8): 2408-2418.
[6]	徐明, 蒋学乾, 何飞, 张帆, 杨天辉, 龙瑞才, 杨青川, 丛丽丽. 紫花苜蓿种子产量与大小相关性状全基因组关联分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(8): 2419-2427.
[7]	邹苇鹏, 翟佳兴, 李迪娜, 黄洁琼, 郭康杰, 岑慧芳, 朱慧森, 许涛. 紫花苜蓿NAC基因家族鉴定及在非生物胁迫下的表达模式分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(8): 2440-2458.
[8]	李婕娜, 冯甘霖, 庞晓攀, 魏小星, 刘慧霞. 水磷配施对紫花苜蓿叶片特征及氮磷计量比的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(8): 2484-2497.
[9]	黄洁琼, 翟佳兴, 王颖, 岑慧芳, 朱慧森, 许涛, 夏方山. 褪黑素对干旱胁迫下紫花苜蓿种子萌发及幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(8): 2575-2583.
[10]	刘泽宇, 袁梓桐, 隋可, 张玉霞, 刘庭玉, 单新河, 张智勇, 王显国. 基于抗寒系数对“WL”系列苜蓿品种抗寒性的综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(8): 2592-2598.
[11]	陈露, 刘佳欣, 李思宇, 陈宁, 包凤轩, 王凤, 曲善民, 刘国富. 耐盐碱根际促生细菌对盐碱胁迫下紫花苜蓿生长和根系生理特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(7): 2323-2329.
[12]	王之杰, 李明序, 张万军. 根癌农杆菌介导的紫花苜蓿遗传转化体系的优化[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(6): 1665-1671.
[13]	孙国, 闫京艳, 梁程博, 马晓璇, 刘道鑫. 克什米尔熊蜂转录组分析及SSR位点开发[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(6): 1742-1751.
[14]	代先林, 马晓颖, 仝宗永, 王瑜, 李向林, 柴旭旭, 何峰. 羊尿氮对苜蓿和高羊茅混播草地生物量和氮利用的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(6): 1864-1871.
[15]	王龙然, 王伟, 蒲小剑, 魏希杰, 傅云洁, 徐成体. 青海东部干旱区不同紫花苜蓿品种饲用品质和生产性能比较[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(6): 1936-1943.