尿素添加对青贮品质影响的Meta分析研究

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.08.029

草地学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (8): 2607-2619.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.08.029

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

尿素添加对青贮品质影响的Meta分析研究

胥贵¹, 汪雅婷¹, 穆麟¹, 王青兰¹, 魏岚¹, 郭阳¹, 魏仲珊², 张志飞¹

1. 湖南农业大学农学院, 湖南长沙 410128;
2. 湖南德人牧业科技有限公司, 湖南常德 415921

收稿日期:2023-12-01 修回日期:2024-03-25 发布日期:2024-09-07
通讯作者: 张志飞,E-mail:zhangzf@hunau.edu.cn
作者简介:胥贵(1998-),女,汉族,湖南岳阳人,硕士研究生,主要从事饲草学研究,E-mail:1650930592@qq.com
基金资助:
湖南农业大学研究生科研创新项目(2024XKC001);湖南省研究生科研创新项目(CX20240635)资助

Meta-Analysis Study of the Effects of Adding Urea on Silage Quality

XU Gui¹, WANG Ya-ting¹, MU Lin¹, WANG Qing-lan¹, WEI Lan¹, GUO Yang¹, WEI Zhong-shan², ZHANG Zhi-fei¹

1. College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan Province 410128, China;
2. Hunan Deren husbandry Science and Technology Ltd, Changde, Hunan Province 415921, China

Received:2023-12-01 Revised:2024-03-25 Published:2024-09-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究通过对尿素添加青贮的中外文文献进行Meta分析，旨在为尿素添加青贮饲料标准化制作和青贮品质提升提供理论依据。通过检索中国知网和Web of Science等文献数据库，依据纳入排除标准，纳入104篇文献，最终得到共349组尿素青贮数据，研究发现尿素添加对青贮饲料的粗蛋白(Crude protein，CP)含量影响显著(P<0.05)，CP含量提高了38.542%；同时显著提高了体外干物质(Dry matter，DM)、有机质(Organic matter，OM)及中性洗涤纤维(Neutral detergent fiber，NDF)消化率(P<0.05)，显著降低了青贮饲料的纤维含量和体外甲烷产量(P<0.05)。尿素添加一定程度上降低了青贮饲料的发酵品质，但可促进乳酸菌的积累、抑制青贮过程中酵母菌、霉菌等腐败微生物的生长，并且使青贮饲料有氧稳定性时间显著提升46.521%(P<0.05)。尿素添加青贮的影响因子亚组分析综合评价确定尿素单独添加适宜的青贮原料种类是水果副产品，适宜的尿素添加量范围为0.9%~1.2%，适宜尿素添加青贮时间是45~60 d或≥60 d。

关键词: Meta分析, 尿素, 青贮, 营养成分, 发酵品质

Abstract: This study conducted a meta-analysis on the domestic and foreign literatures regarding the addition of urea to silage, to provides insights for standardizing production processes and enhancing the quality of urea-added silage. By searching databases such as China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Web of Science,104 articles were incorporated based on inclusion and exclusion criteria,yielding a total of 349 sets of urea-silage data. The results indicated that urea addition had a significant effect on the crude protein (CP) content of silage (P<0.05),which increased by 38.542%. It also significantly increased in vitro dry matter (DM),organic matter (OM) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) digestibility (P<0.05),and significantly decreased the fiber content and in vitro methane production (P<0.05). The addition of urea marginally reduced the fermentation quality of silage,but promoted the accumulation of lactic acid bacteria,inhibited the growth of spoilage microorganisms such as yeasts and molds during ensiling,and significantly extended the aerobic stability time of silage by 46.521% (P<0.05). Subgroup analysis and comprehensive evaluation of influencing factors determine appropriate silage raw material for urea addition as fruit by-products,with suitable urea amounts of 0.9%~1.2% and silage times of 45~60 or ≥60 days.

Key words: Meta-analysis, Urea, Silage, Nutrients, Fermentation quality

中图分类号:

S816.53

胥贵, 汪雅婷, 穆麟, 王青兰, 魏岚, 郭阳, 魏仲珊, 张志飞. 尿素添加对青贮品质影响的Meta分析研究[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(8): 2607-2619.

XU Gui, WANG Ya-ting, MU Lin, WANG Qing-lan, WEI Lan, GUO Yang, WEI Zhong-shan, ZHANG Zhi-fei. Meta-Analysis Study of the Effects of Adding Urea on Silage Quality[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(8): 2607-2619.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.08.029

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2024/V32/I8/2607

参考文献

[1] 段辉,徐才武,李培发,等. 青贮饲料的应用与技术措施[J]. 中国畜禽种业,2012,8(9):66-67
[2] 李建国. 能提高青贮饲料品质的添加剂[J]. 饲料研究,1990(11):18-19
[3] 李棻,胡皋,孙贵相. 尿素玉米青贮及其饲喂试验初报[J]. 宁夏农林科技,1965(8):13-18
[4] BUDZIER H H. Microbiological studies on the problems of animal feed silage. 2. The action of an addition of urea or ammonium bicarbonate on the microbial dynamics[J]. Agricultural and Food Science,1967(121):250-268
[5] 邓凯东,陈玉华,茅慧华,等. 调制方法对桑叶青贮营养成分和活性物质含量的影响[J]. 饲料研究,2021,44(11):90-93
[6] 谢展. 尿素对紫花苜蓿混合青贮动态发酵的影响[D]. 长沙:湖南农业大学,2021:15-28
[7] 刘海宁,吴昊,姚灿,等. Meta分析中连续性数据的深度提取方法[J]. 中国循证医学杂志,2017,17(1):117-121
[8] HEDGES L V,GUREVITCH J,CURTIS P S. The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology[J]. Ecology,1999,80(4):1150-1156
[9] 晏和飘,李文龙,梁天刚,等. 青藏高原退化高寒草地恢复对不同措施响应的Meta分析[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(S1):190-198
[10] CURTIS P S,WANG X. A meta-analysis of elevated CO₂ effects on woody plant mass,form,and physiology[J]. Oecologia,1998,113(3):299-313
[11] 任凤玲,张旭博,孙楠,等. 施用有机肥对中国农田土壤微生物量影响的整合分析[J]. 中国农业科学,2018,51(1):119-128
[12] 王祎. 脊髓电刺激治疗腰椎手术失败综合征疗效的Meta分析[D]. 北京:北京体育大学,2019:27
[13] HIGGINS J P,THOMPSON S G,DEEKS J J,et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysis[J]. British Medical Journal,2003,327(7414):557-560
[14] 丁凤琴,赵虎英. 感恩的个体主观幸福感更强?——一项元分析[J]. 心理科学展,2018,26(10):1749-1764
[15] EGGER M,SMITH G D,SCHNEIDER M,et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple,graphical test[J]. British Medical Journal,1997,315(7109):629-634
[16] 王里彦,严慧,李金辉,等. 基于Meta分析的全株玉米青贮营养成分含量及其影响因素[J]. 动物营养学报,2022,34(2):1352-1360
[17] 黄丽娟,吴康乐,曹欣,等. 酶制剂和有机酸盐对绿狐尾藻与稻秸混合青贮的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2022,44(11):114-120
[18] 仲慧月,郑楠,王加启,等. 瘤胃尿素分解菌及脲酶的分子特征与调控研究进展[J]. 动物营养学报,2023,35(5):2797-2807
[19] MCDONALD P,HENDERSON A R,HERON S J E. The biochemistry of silage[J]. Experimental Agriculture,1991,28(1):340
[20] OHSHIMA M,MCDONALD P. A review of the changes in nitrogenous compounds of herbage during ensilage[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1978(29):497-505
[21] 李玲,赵秀芬,赵钢. 青贮处理对饲料蛋白质组分的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2010,32(6):110-112
[22] ALVAREZ F J,PRESTON T R,INVESTIGACION C. Leucaena Leucocephala as protein supplement for dual purpose milk and weaned calf production on sugar cane based rations[J]. Agricultural and Food Sciences,1976(48):135-142
[23] ORTIZ-RUBIO M A,ØRSKOV E R,MILNE J,et al. Effect of different sources of nitrogen on in situ degradability and feed intake of Zebu cattle fed sugarcane tops (Saccharum officinarum)[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,2007,139(3-4):143-158
[24] 金丽娜,蒋苏苏,敬淑燕,等. 黄芪药渣与全株玉米混合青贮对饲料感官、发酵品质及营养成分的影响[J]. 草地学报,2024,32(2):630-636
[25] SETL J,SEPPL J,PULLI S,et al. Maize for silage. I. Conservation of whole maize plant for silage with treatment of preservatives and urea before ensiling[J]. Agricultural and Food Science,1979,51(1):229-237
[26] 马亚伟,曲云涛,张丽丽,等. 不同添加剂对青贮玉米秸秆可利用真蛋白的影响[J]. 当代畜牧,2013(29):67-68
[27] GÓMEZ-VÁZQUEZ A,PINOS-RODRÍGUEZ J M,GARCÍA-LÓPEZ J C,et al. Nutritional value of sugarcane silage enriched with corn grain,urea,and minerals as feed supplement on growth performance of beef steers grazing stargrass[J]. Tropical Animal Health and Production,2011,43(1):215-220
[28] BAGˇCIK C,KOÇF,ERTEN K,et al. Lentilactobacillus buchneri preactivation affects the mitigation of methane emission in corn silage treated with or without urea[J]. Fermentation,2022,8(120):747
[29] SAMINATHAN M,WAN MOHAMED W N,MD NOH 'A,et al. Effects of urea-treated oil palm frond on nutrient composition and in vitro rumen fermentation using goat rumen fluid[J]. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition,2022(106):1228-1237
[30] ALVIRA P,TOMÁS-PEJÓ E,BALLESTEROS M. Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis:A review[J]. Bioresource Technology,2010(101):4851-4861
[31] GíRIO F M,FONSECA C,CARVALHEIRO F. Hemicelluloses for fuel ethanol:A review[J]. Bioresource Technology,2010(101):4775-4800
[32] 青格尔,于晓芳,高聚林,等. 玉米秸秆低温降解复合菌系降解能力及微生物组成研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2020,28(11):1753-1765
[33] NOORDAR H,MALECKY M,JAHANIAN NAJAFABADI H,et al. Evaluating nutritional value of processed potato vines by in vitro gas production[J]. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research,2017,60(2):189-204
[34] ROWGHANI E,ZAMIRI M J,SERADJ A R. The chemical composition,rumen degradability,in vitro gas production,energy content and digestibility of olive cake ensiled with additives[J]. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research,Shiraz University,2008,9(3):213-221
[35] CHEN Y,CHENG J J,CREAMER K S. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process:A review[J]. Bioresource Technology,2008,99(10):4044-4064
[36] ZHANG X,WANG M,WANG R,et al. Urea plus nitrate pretreatment of rice and wheat straws enhances degradation and reduces methane production in in vitro ruminal culture[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2018,98(14):5205-5211
[37] CUI X,SUN H,WEN X,et al. Urea-assisted ensiling process of wilted maize stover for profitable biomethane production[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2020(757):143-751
[38] FRANCO R T,BUFFIèRE P,BAYARD R. Ensiling for biogas production:critical parameters. A review[J]. Biomass Bioenergy,2016(94):94-104
[39] ULLOA C A. Effect of storage period and treatment on the composition and digestibility of olive pomace in cattle[D]. California:California Polytechnic State University,2018:22
[40] DA SILVA T C,SMITH M L,BARNARD A M,et al. The effect of a chemical additive on the fermentation and aerobic stability of high-moisture corn[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2015(98):1-12
[41] VANDERSLUIS B,HESS D C,PESYNA C,et al. Broad metabolic sensitivity profiling of a prototrophic yeast deletion collection[J]. Genome Biology,2014(15):1-18
[42] SANTOS A,SANTOS E,OLIVEIRA J,et al. Effect of urea on gas and effluent losses,microbial populations,aerobic stability and chemical composition of corn (Zea mays L.) silage[J]. Journal of the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences,2020,53(1):309-319
[43] NEUMANN M,OLIBONI R,OLIVEIRA M R,et al. Aditivos químicos utilizados em silagens[J]. Pesquisa Aplicada and Agrotecnologia,2010(3):187-195
[44] SANTOS M V F,GÓMEZ CASTRO A G,PEREA J M,et al. Fatores que afetam o valor nutritivo das silagens de forrageiras tropicais[J]. Archivos de Zootecnia,2010(59):25-43
[45] SANTOS A P M D,SANTOS E M,OLIVEIRA J S D,et al. Effects of urea addition on the fermentation of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) silage[J]. African Journal of Range and Forage Science,2018(35):55-62
[46] MASSARO JUNIOR F L,BUMBIERIS JUNIOR V H,ZANIN E,et al. Effect of storage time and use of additives on the quality of grape pomace silages[J]. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation,2020,44(4):14373
[47] CANBOLAT Ö,KAMALAK A,KARA H. The effects of urea supplementation on pomegranate pulp (Punica granatum L.) silage fermentation,aerobic stability and in vitro gas production[J]. Ankara üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi,2014,61(3):217-223
[48] CANBOLAT Ö. Effect of supplementation of urea on the nutritive value and fermentation characteristics of apple pulp silage[J]. Journal of Agricultural Sciences-Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi,2022,28(3):430-437
[49] 李梦楚,王定发,周汉林,等. 不同青贮方式对菠萝茎叶饲用品质的影响[J]. 热带作物学报,2014,35(5):999-1004
[50] 贾宏定,黄丽娟,刘蕾,等. 不同品种水稻秸秆青贮品质的比较研究[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(5):1310-1318
[51] 高丽娟,王小芬,崔宗均. 玉米、小麦、水稻秸秆自然发酵的生化变化[J]. 草地学报,2005,13(1):47-51
[52] 魏玉明,郝怀志,杨发荣,等. 不同添加剂对藜麦秸秆裹包青贮品质的影响[J]. 甘肃农业科技,2019(12):38-43
[53] 袁玉芳,类延菊,邵立业,等. 农作物秸秆饲料开发利用技术及在动物生产中的应用[J]. 饲料研究,2023(16):175-178
[54] 魏杰. 不同添加剂对燕麦草青贮品质和体外消化率的影响[J]. 饲料研究,2023,46(5):113-117
[55] 张发强,刘萍,李清,等. 不同青贮剂对甘蔗梢青贮常规营养成分和有机酸及玉米赤霉烯酮的影响[J]. 饲料研究,2022,45(03):101-105
[56] 荣辉,余成群,李志华,等. 添加糖蜜和尿素对象草青贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2012,20(5):940-946
[57] 王建福,雷赵民,万学瑞,等. 5株乳酸菌复合物与CaCO₃,酶及尿素不同组合对全株玉米青贮品质影响[J]. 草业学报,2018,27(3):90-97
[58] 唐振华,王波,邹彩霞,等. 不同微生物添加剂组合对甘蔗尾青贮品质影响[J]. 饲料工业,2016,37(1):32-37
[59] 江波. 青贮饲料的加工调制技术[J]. 浙江畜牧兽医,2022,47(2):31-33
[60] ZIELIN'SKA K,FABISZEWSKA A,S'WITEK M,et al. Evaluation of the ability to metabolize 1,2-propanediol by heterofermentative bacteria of the genus Lactobacillus[J]. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology,2017(26):60-63
[61] LI Y,NISHINO N. Bacterial and fungal communities of wilted Italian ryegrass silage inoculated with and without Lactobacillus rhamnosus or Lactobacillus buchneri[J]. Letters in Applied Microbiology,2011(52):314-321(责任编辑彭露茜)第32卷第8期 Vol.32 No. 8草地学报 ACTAAGRESTIASINICA 2024年 8月

尿素添加对青贮品质影响的Meta分析研究

Meta-Analysis Study of the Effects of Adding Urea on Silage Quality

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	柴雨昕, 贾舒安, 张天, 李肖, 陈永成, 黄嵘峥, 张凡凡. 植物乳杆菌对麻叶荨麻青贮品质和绵羊瘤胃降解特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(7): 2283-2289.
[2]	杨丹, 尹含雪, 张庆. 苯乳酸和温度对玉米秸秆青贮发酵品质及抗性基因的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(7): 2290-2296.
[3]	赵永琦, 尹国丽, 巩海强, 梁文斌, 雷琴. 甘南地区青贮牧草耐低温乳酸菌的筛选与鉴定[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(7): 2305-2313.
[4]	武齐丰, 陈晨, 黄沁骄, 张云飞, 李小梅, 陈远航, 文兴金, 闫艳红. 纤维素酶和乳酸菌对杂交象草青贮结构性碳水化合物影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(7): 2314-2322.
[5]	程志泽, 伊斯拉依·达吾提, 万江春, 乃比·阿不来提, 艾比布拉·伊马木. 不同添加剂对辣椒秸秆青贮品质及细菌多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(7): 2330-2336.
[6]	安海涛, 孙彩彩, 董全民, 杨晓霞, 张春辉, 赵新全. 青藏高原土壤微生物生物量对放牧强度响应的Meta分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(6): 1913-1922.
[7]	严旭, 左艳春, 王红林, 吴子周, 李杨, 王强锋, 杜周和. 青贮压实的影响因素与技术策略[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(6): 1974-1985.
[8]	亓慧敏, 陈昂, 杨秀春. 基于无人机高光谱的内蒙古天然牧草氮磷钾含量的反演[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(5): 1500-1512.
[9]	黑梦琴, 曹正宇, 王志远, 代春辉, 陈程, 张文举. 添加复合乳酸菌和糖蜜对不同水分含量苜蓿青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(5): 1601-1609.
[10]	孔德慧, 靳思玉, 曹阳. 乳酸菌和混合酸对苜蓿青贮品质、叶绿素及其降解酶的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(5): 1610-1618.
[11]	胡梦洁, 肖燕子, 姜超, 罗俊杰, 卢娜, 纳钦, 郎宇, 张健, 刘建民, 何立超, 唐佳新. 添加剂对紫花苜蓿和高丹草混合青贮品质及维生素含量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(5): 1642-1649.
[12]	孙彩彩, 安海涛, 杨晓霞, 吕卫东, 刘文亭, 董全民. 放牧对中小型土壤动物群落结构影响的Meta分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(4): 1194-1203.
[13]	孙蓉, 李茂, 陈桂武, 字学娟, 王凯. 添加裸花紫珠对王草青贮发酵品质和体外产气特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(4): 1267-1275.
[14]	黄莉莹, 崔卫东, 田静, 张建国. 大豆秸和稻草对甜玉米秸秆和湿啤酒糟混合青贮的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(3): 945-951.
[15]	何鹏亮, 揭红东, 朱宁静, 罗子璇, 许妍, 谢志玉, 邢虎成, 揭雨成. 湖南东西部地区青贮玉米生产性能比较研究[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(3): 977-984.