Studies on the Dynamics of Above-ground Biomass and Nutritive Value of Annual Ryegrass and Common Vetch Mixtures

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2019.02.028

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (2): 473-481.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2019.02.028

Previous Articles Next Articles

Studies on the Dynamics of Above-ground Biomass and Nutritive Value of Annual Ryegrass and Common Vetch Mixtures

GOU Wen-long¹, LI Ping², ZHANG Jian-bo², WANG Ting³, MA Xiao⁴, ZHOU Su², BAI Shi-qie², Shi Shang-li¹

1. College of Pratacultura Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China;
2. Sichuan Academy of Grassland Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 611731, China;
3. School of Life Science and Engineering, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, Sichuan Province 621000, China;
4. Department of grassland science, Sichuan Gansu Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 611130, China

Received:2019-03-09 Revised:2019-04-15 Online:2019-04-15 Published:2019-05-30

多花黑麦草+箭筈豌豆混播草地地上生物量和营养品质动态研究

苟文龙¹, 李平², 张建波², 王婷³, 马啸⁴, 周俗², 白史且², 师尚礼¹

1. 甘肃农业大学草业学院, 甘肃兰州 730070;
2. 四川省草原科学研究院, 四川成都 611731;
3. 西南大学生命科学学院, 四川绵阳 621000;
4. 四川农业大学草业科学系, 四川成都 611130

通讯作者: 师尚礼
作者简介:苟文龙(1975-),男,陕西咸阳人,副研究员,博士研究生,主要从事牧草栽培研究,E-mail:514240346@qq.com
基金资助:
四川省重点研发面上项目（2019YFN0137）；国家重点研发项目（2017YFD0502）资助

Abstract

Abstract: To discuss the effects of grass/legume ratio and cutting time on above-ground biomass and nutrient value of grass-legume mixture grassland,Five treatments (100% annual ryegrass (H),75% annual ryegrass+25% common vetch (HJ₁),50% annual ryegrass+50% common vetch (HJ₂),25% annual ryegrass+75% common vetch (HJ₃) and 100% common vetch (J) were set up in this study. The results showed that sowing ratio had significant effects (P<0.05) on grass tillers/legume branches,crude protein content,productions of dry matter,crude protein and in vitro digestible dry matter,but had no effects on plant height,ratio of stem/leaf and concentrations of dry matter,neutral detergent fiber,acid detergent fiber and in vitro dry matter digestibility;cutting time had effects (P<0.05) on most of parameters (except of grass tillers and dry matter production at each harvest);there were significant interactive effects of sowing ratio and cutting time on legume branches,ratio of stem/leaf,crude protein content,in vitro dry matter digestibility and accumulative dry matter production(P<0.05). Mixture with HJ₂ produced dry matter of 19 030.44 kg·hm^-2,crude protein of 3 130.66 kg·hm^-2,digestive dry matter of 13 214.14 kg·hm^-2. When all parameters considered,mixture with HJ₂ was the best ratio of mixture.

Key words: Annual ryegrass, Common vetch, Mixture sowing, Above-ground biomass, Nutritive value

摘要： 为探讨混播比例和刈割时期对禾豆混播草地地上生物量和营养品质的影响，本研究设多花黑麦草100%（H）、75%多花黑麦草+25%箭筈豌豆（HJ₁）、50%多花黑麦草+50%箭筈豌豆（HJ₂）、25%多花黑麦草+75%箭筈豌豆（HJ₃）与100%箭筈豌豆（J）5个处理，结果表明，混播比例可显著（P<0.05）影响分蘖/分枝数、粗蛋白含量、单茬/累计干物质产量、粗蛋白产量和可消化干物质产量，对株高、茎叶比、干物质含量、中性洗涤纤维含量、酸性洗涤纤维含量和可消化干物质含量无显著影响；刈割时期只对黑麦草分蘖数和单茬干物质产量无显著性影响，对其余指标有显著影响（P<0.05）；混播比例与刈割时期对箭筈豌豆分枝数、茎叶比、粗蛋白含量、可消化干物质含量和累计干物质产量有交互效应（P<0.05）。混播组合HJ₂累计干物质产量19 030.44kg·hm^-2、累计粗蛋白产量3 130.66 kg·hm^-2、累计可消化干物质产量13 214.14 kg·hm^-2，为最佳混播组合。

关键词: 多花黑麦草, 箭筈豌豆, 混播, 地上生物量, 营养品质

CLC Number:

GOU Wen-long, LI Ping, ZHANG Jian-bo, WANG Ting, MA Xiao, ZHOU Su, BAI Shi-qie, Shi Shang-li. Studies on the Dynamics of Above-ground Biomass and Nutritive Value of Annual Ryegrass and Common Vetch Mixtures[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(2): 473-481.

苟文龙, 李平, 张建波, 王婷, 马啸, 周俗, 白史且, 师尚礼. 多花黑麦草+箭筈豌豆混播草地地上生物量和营养品质动态研究[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(2): 473-481.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2019.02.028

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2019/V27/I2/473

References

[1] 周寿荣,余云高,毛凯,等. 稻田单播和混播豆禾牧草与水稻轮作的经济生态效益研究[J]. 四川草原,1992(3):2-8
[2] 张新跃. 四川农区高效草地农业系统研究进展[J]. 草业科学,2004,21(12):7-14
[3] Frankow-Lindberg B E,Halling M,Hoglind M,et al. Yield and stability of yield of single and multi-clover grass-clover swards in two contrasting temperate environments[J]. Grass and Forage Science,2009,64(3):236-245
[4] Nguyen C. Rhizodeposition of organic C by plants:mechanisms and controls[J]. Agronomie,2003,23(5-6):375-396
[5] 杨曌,张新全,李向林,等. 应用灰色关联度综合评价17个不同秋眠级苜蓿的生产性能[J]. 草业学报,2009,18(5):67-72
[6] 杨恒山,邰继承,范富. 播种方式对人工草地土壤有机碳氧化稳定性和化学结合形态的影响[J]. 草业学报,2011,20(3):36-42
[7] 左艳春,杨春华,杜周和,等. 扁穗牛鞭草和白三叶混播组合的综合评价[J].西南农业学报,2008,21(4):1094-1099
[8] Farnham D E,George J R. Dinitrogen fixation and nitrogen transfer in birdsfoot trefoil-orchardgrass communities[J]. Agronomy Journal,1994,86:890-894
[9] Townsend C E. Breeding,physiology,culture,and utilization of cicer milkvetch (Astragalus cicer L.)[J]. Advances in Agronomy,1993,49:253-308
[10] 赵忠,曹永林,王裕昌,等. 高寒牧区牧草混播比例筛选试验[J]. 草与畜杂志,1994(11):21-23
[11] 毛凯,周寿荣,刘忠. 箭筈豌豆与多花黑麦草混播群落氮素动态研究[J]. 草业科学,1996,13(1):9-21
[12] 周寿荣,余云高,毛凯,等. 稻田单播和混播豆禾牧草与水稻轮作的经济生态效益研究[J]. 四川草原,1992(3):2-8
[13] 林多胡,陈云平. 紫云英与黑麦草混播研究[J]. 福建农业科技,1986(6):15-17
[14] 柳茜,傅平,敖学成,等. 冬闲田多花黑麦草+光叶紫花苕混播草地生产性能与种间竞争的研究[J]. 草地学报,2016,24(1):42-46
[15] 毛凯,周寿荣. 一年生春性牧草混播种群生物量动态研究[J]. 草业学报,1996,5(2):66-71
[16] 毛凯,周寿荣,王四敏,等. 箭筈豌豆混播黑麦草生物量和种间竞争的研究[J]. 草地学报,1997,5(1) 8-14
[17] Marten G C.放牧研究:设计方法与分析[M]. 李永宏,汪诗平,尹永军,等译.北京:气象出版社,1997:68-81
[18] Brooker R W,Callaghan T V.The balance between positive and negative plant interactions and its relationship to environmental gradients:A model[J]. Oikos,1998,81:196-207
[19] 张静,赵成章,盛亚萍,等. 高寒山区混播草地燕麦和毛苕子种间竞争对密度的响应[J]. 生态学杂志,2012,31(7):1605-1611
[20] 马春晖,韩建国,李鸿祥,等. 冬牧70黑麦+箭筈豌豆混播草地生物量、品质及种间竞争的动态研究[J]. 草业学报,1999,8(4):56-64
[21] McBratney J M. Productivity of red clover grown alone and with companion grasses over a 4-year period[J]. Crass and Forage Science,1981,36:267-279
[22] 韩建国,马春晖,毛培胜,等. 播种比例和施氮量及刈割期对燕麦与豌豆混播草地产草量和质量的影响[J]. 草地学报,1999,7(2):87-94
[23] Hui Qu,Xin Bao Liu,Chen Fei Dong,et al. Field performance and nutritive value of sweet sorghum in eastern China[J]. Field Crops Research,2014,157:84-88
[24] 李佶恺,孙涛,旺扎,等. 西藏地区燕麦与箭筈豌豆不同混播比例对牧草产量和质量的影响[J]. 草地学报,2011,19(5):830-833
[25] Carmi A,Aharoni Y,Edelstein M,et al. Effects of irrigation and plant density on yield,composition and in vitro digestibility of a new forage sorghum variety,Tal,at two maturity stages[J]. Animal Feed Science,2006,131,121-133

Studies on the Dynamics of Above-ground Biomass and Nutritive Value of Annual Ryegrass and Common Vetch Mixtures

多花黑麦草+箭筈豌豆混播草地地上生物量和营养品质动态研究

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	ZHANG Zhong-hua, MA Li, ZHOU Bing-rong, SONG Ming-hua, XU Wen-hua, DENG Yan-fang, WANG Fang, SHE Yan-di, ZHANG Qian, YAO Bu-qing, MA Zhen, ZHOU Hua-kun. Esponse of the Functional Diversity of Dominant Plants to Warming and Simulated Grazing in Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 225-232.
[2]	HUANG Jia-xing, WU Jing, LI Chun-bin, QIN Ge-xia, QIAN Juan-bing, LI Huai-hai. Remote Sensing Retrieval of grassland Above-Ground Biomass in Tianzhu County based on Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 Data [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2023-2030.
[3]	YU Tie-feng, HAO Feng, ZHANG Yong-liang, GAO Kai. Response of Soil Enzyme and Soil Fertility of Artificial Grassland in Sandy Soil to Different Mixture Ratio of Alfalfa and Smooth Brome [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1217-1223.
[4]	LI Lin, YANG Pei-long, LI Xiu-mei, WEN Zhi-guo, WANG Jian-ying, YAN Hai-jie. Comparison of Nutritive Value in different parts、height and Silage Time of Arundo donax [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(4): 1168-1172.
[5]	ZOU Jun-hong, LIU Lin, TANG Chuan-jiang, LIU Wei, GAN Xiao-yu, LU Yan, GAN You-min, ZHOU Ji-qiong, GAO Wu-chao, LI Qi, RAN Zhuo-ya, ZHONG Mi-sha. Wild Forage Resources and Evaluation of Their Feeding Value in Natural Grassland of Northwest Sichuan [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(2): 461-467.
[6]	YANG Xiao-peng, LI Ping, DONG Chen-fei, MA Xiao, GOU Wen-long. Studies on the Dynamics of Above-ground Biomass and Nutritive Value of Annual Ryegrass and Common Oat Mixtures [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(1): 149-158.
[7]	TANG Chen-yang, WEI Zhen-wu, YAN Tian-fang, ZHOU Ke-you, ZHANG Qi, WU Jia-long. Effect of Row Ratio on Yield and Quality of Different Intercropping Modes [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(1): 214-220.
[8]	GOU Wen-long, LI Ping, Dong Chen-fei, Li Da-xu, BAI Shi-qie, SHI Shang-li. Effects of Mixture Sowing Ratio and Cutting Time on the Soil Bacterial Community in Annual Ryegrass and Common Vetch Mixture [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(5): 1222-1230.
[9]	YAO Xi-xi, GONG Xu-yin, ZHANG Li-ping, JIAO Ting, TAO Hai-xia, GUO Bin, ZHANG Ai-qing, WU Jian-ping. Effects of Grazing and Long-term Fencing on Nutritive Values of Dominant Species in Alpine Meadow of Qilian Mountains [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018, 26(6): 1354-1362.
[10]	GAO Xiao-gang, MOU Jing, BU Hai-yan, LI Qiu-xia, WANG Wen-yin, XU Dang-hui. Effect of Nitrogen and Silicon Addition on Poa Poophagorum in Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018, 26(6): 1416-1420.
[11]	YAO Xi-xi, GONG Xu-yin, ZHANG Li-ping, WANG Jian-fu, LANG Xia, WANG Cai-lian, SONG Shu-zhen, WU Jian-ping. Effects of Different Grazing Intensities on Nutritive Values of Dominant Species in Alpine Meadow of Qilian Mountains [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018, 26(5): 1159-1167.
[12]	ZHAO Ling-ping, WEI Nan, TAN Shi-tu, HE Qing-bo, WANG Zhan-bin, FAN Wen-na, SUN Ping. Effects of Winter Fire on Vegetation Community Characteristics and Soil Properties of A Typical Steppe on the Loess Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018, 26(3): 576-583.
[13]	GUO Tong-tian, LIU Bo-wen, TANG Xue-you, ZHANG Xiong, SUN Luan-zi. Effects of Drought Pretreatment on Salt Tolerance of Annual Ryegrass [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018, 26(2): 435-440.
[14]	BAI Tian-xiao, BAI Yang, LIU An-na, MINGGAGUD Hugjilt, BAOYIN Tao-ge-tao. The Effect of Mowing and Nutrient Adding Back on the Biomass and Compositions of Leymus Chinensis Grassland Plant Community [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2017, 25(6): 1206-1211.
[15]	ZHANG Qi, WU Ju-ying, YANG Xue-jun, YUAN Xiao-huan. Mixture Sowing and Sod Production of Carex leucochlora [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(5): 1139-1145.