Effects of Different Additives on Silage Quality of Chinese Medicine Residue

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.12.031

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (12): 3851-3857.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.12.031

Previous Articles Next Articles

Effects of Different Additives on Silage Quality of Chinese Medicine Residue

ZHAN Jia-qi, CHEN Dan-dan, GUO Tian-xin, GUO Xiang, WU Shuo, CHEN Xiao-yang, ZHOU Wei, ZHANG Qing

College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangdong Province Research Center of Woody Forage Engineering Technology, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Innovative Development and Utilization of Forest Plant Germplasm, State Key Laboratory for Conservaion and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510642, China

Received:2023-05-26 Revised:2023-09-19 Online:2023-12-15 Published:2024-01-03

不同添加剂对中药渣青贮品质的影响

詹佳琦, 陈丹丹, 郭田心, 郭香, 吴硕, 陈晓阳, 周玮, 张庆

华南农业大学林学与风景园林学院, 广东木本饲料工程技术研究中心, 广东省森林植物种质创新与利用重点实验室, 亚热带农业生物资源保护与利用国家重点实验室, 广东广州 510642

通讯作者: 周玮,E-mail:wzhou@scau.edu.cn;张庆,E-mail:zqing1988@126.com
作者简介:詹佳琦(2001-)，女，汉族，广东潮州人，本科在读，主要从事青贮饲料研究,E-mail：1120884894@qq.com;
基金资助:
广东省自然基金项目(2020A1515011253)；广州市科技计划项目(202102020808)资助

Abstract

Abstract: To investigate the effects of different additives on the quality of Chinese medicine residue (CMR) silage,Chinese medicine residue 1 (mixed traditional Chinese medicine residue of Astragalus membranaceus,Chinese yam and Poria cocos,CMR1) and Chinese medicine residue 2 (Chaihu traditional Chinese medicine residue,CMR2) were separately combined with 0.5% and 1% glucose (G),Lactobacillus plantarum (LP) and enzymes[cellulase (CE),pectinase (PE),and xylanase (XY)]. After 34 days of silage,samples were taken to analyze the fermentation quality and nutritional value of traditional Chinese medicine residue. The results showed that different addition treatments all reduced the pH of traditional Chinese medicine residue (P<0.05). Compared with the control,CMR2 treated with 1% G significantly increased soluble carbohydrates (P<0.05);The combination treatment of LP and different enzymes reduced the fiber content and ammonia nitrogen content of the two CMRs (P<0.05),while the LP+CE and LP+XY treatments increased the crude protein content of CMR1. At the same time,the LP+CE treatment also significantly reduced the ammonia nitrogen content of CMR1 (P<0.05). In summary,adding different concentrations of glucose,LP,and different enzyme combinations could improve the silage quality of CMR,and the combination of LP and enzyme preparations could help improve the protein preservation rate of the two CMRs.

Key words: Traditional Chinese medicine residue, Silage, Fermentation quality, Silage additive

摘要： 为探究不同添加剂对中药渣(Chinese medicine residue,CMR)青贮品质的影响，将中药渣1(黄芪、山药与茯苓混合中药渣，CMR1)和中药渣2(柴胡中药渣，CMR2)用0.5%和1%葡萄糖(G)以及植物乳杆菌(Lactobacilusplantarum，LP)与酶[纤维素酶(Cellulase，CE)、果胶酶(Pectinase，PE)和木聚糖酶(Xylanase，XY)]分别组合添加的方式进行处理并设对照组，青贮34 d后取样分析中药渣的发酵品质与营养价值。结果表明:不同添加处理均降低了中药渣的pH值(P<0.05)；与对照相比，1%G处理的CMR2显著增加了可溶性碳水化合物含量(P<0.05);LP与不同酶的组合处理降低了两种CMR的纤维素及氨态氮含量(P<0.05),LP+CE和LP+XY处理增加了CMR1的粗蛋白含量，同时LP+CE处理还显著减少了CMR1的氨态氮含量(P<0.05)。综上所述，添加不同浓度葡萄糖、LP与不同酶组合制剂均能改善CMR的青贮品质，LP与酶制剂组合添加还有助于改善两种CMR的蛋白质保存率。

关键词: 中药渣, 青贮, 发酵品质, 青贮添加剂

CLC Number:

S816.5+3

ZHAN Jia-qi, CHEN Dan-dan, GUO Tian-xin, GUO Xiang, WU Shuo, CHEN Xiao-yang, ZHOU Wei, ZHANG Qing. Effects of Different Additives on Silage Quality of Chinese Medicine Residue[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(12): 3851-3857.

詹佳琦, 陈丹丹, 郭田心, 郭香, 吴硕, 陈晓阳, 周玮, 张庆. 不同添加剂对中药渣青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(12): 3851-3857.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.12.031

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2023/V31/I12/3851

References

[1] 张威龙,帖靖玺. 中药渣资源化利用研究进展[J]. 信阳农林学院学报,2020,30(3):80-83
[2] 杨在宾,刘丽,杜明宏. 我国饲料业的发展及饲料资源供求现状浅析[J]. 饲料工业,2008(19):45-49
[3] 李爱科,郝淑红,张晓琳,等. 我国饲料资源开发现状及前景展望[J]. 畜牧市场,2007(9):13-16
[4] 刘瑜彬,葛亚中,孙晓燕,等. 发酵中药渣在生猪无抗养殖中的应用[J]. 中国食物与营养,2018,24(4):19-22
[5] 朱彤,王亚犁,何继武,等. 发酵中药渣添加饲料对不同猪群粪污减排效果的影响[J]. 中国畜禽种业,2021,17(11):64-65
[6] 李华磊,杨桂芬,任明晋,等. "十全大补"发酵中药渣饲用安全及应用效果的研究[J]. 饲料研究,2021,44(17):18-22
[7] 康永刚,廖云琼,昌莉丽. 发酵中药渣的营养价值及在动物生产中的应用研究进展[J]. 中国畜牧杂志,2023,59(11):83-88
[8] 王丰园,金海炎,丁凌飞,等. 纤维素酶及其活性提升研究进展[J]. 现代农村科技,2022(3):65-68
[9] 邓宗澳,邓芳松,蒋金娟,等. 纤维素酶对甘蔗梢与玉米秆混合青贮品质的影响[J]. 草学,2023(2):40-46
[10] 刘梦洁,尹清强,常娟,等. 植物乳杆菌和纤维素酶对玉米秸秆降解及糖化效果的影响[J]. 中国饲料,2020(23):34-39
[11] 吴婕. 试析果胶酶的生产和应用[J]. 当代化工研究,2021(15):164-165
[12] 丁浩,吴永杰,邵涛,等. 纤维素酶和木聚糖酶对象草青贮发酵品质及体外消化率的影响[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(11):2600-2608
[13] DESTA S T,LI J F,SHAO T. Ensiling characteristics,structural and nonstructural carbohydrate composition and enzymatic digestibility of Napier grass ensiled with additives[J]. Bioresource Technology,2016(221):447-454
[14] 吕竑建,邹璇,吴硕,等. 添加辣木叶和香肠乳杆菌对玉米秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(6):1343-1349
[15] 王成,王益,周玮,等. 植物乳杆菌和含水量对辣木叶青贮品质和单宁含量的影响[J]. 草业学报,2019,28(6):109-118
[16] 吴硕,邹璇,王明亚,等. 陈皮柑汁对柱花草和水稻秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(7):1565-1570
[17] 刘昌芬,李国华. 辣木的营养价值[J]. 热带农业科技,2004,27(1):4-8
[18] 郑明扬,吴硕,郭香,等. 添加乳酸菌和纤维素酶对砂仁叶青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(5):1113-1117
[19] 吕竑建,郭香,陈德奎,等. 植物乳酸菌和贮藏温度对辣木叶青贮品质的影响[J]. 草业学报,2021,30(3):121-128
[20] 郭香,陈德奎,陈娜,等. 含水量和添加剂对黄梁木叶青贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 草业学报,2021,30(8):199-205
[21] BOLSEN K K,LIN C,BRENT B E,et al. Effect of silage additives on the microbial succession and fermentation process of alfalfa and corn silages[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1992,75(11):3066-3083
[22] 张丽英. 饲料分析及质量检测技术[M]. 第3版.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2007:49-75
[23] 郭鲁宏,杨顺楷. 利用固定化黑曲霉单宁酶制备没食子酸的研究[J]. 生物工程学报,2000,16(5):614-617
[24] JESSIE G,VERN S B,KAREN A B. Corn forage yield and quality for silage in short growing season areas of the canadian prairies[J]. Agronomy,2018,8(9):164
[25] 黎智华,祝倩,姬玉娇,等. 六种中药渣的营养成分[J]. 天然产物研究与开发,2017,29(1):91-95
[26] 高义彪,闫素梅,赵天章,等. 奶牛主要饲料原料纤维物质瘤胃降解率的研究[J]. 中国饲料,2008(8):14-17,23
[27] 王春梅,王美晨,粱海伟,等. 七种中药渣主要饲用营养成分的测定[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医,2019(2):111-113
[28] 陈丹丹,黄佩珊,张超,等. 植物乳杆菌对荔枝叶青贮品质及体外降解特性的影响[J]. 草地学报,2023,31(7):2232-2240
[29] 张庆. 饲草青贮用乳酸菌的筛选及作用机理[D]. 北京:中国农业大学,2016:8
[30] 何立贵. 青贮饲料品质鉴定及影响关键因素[J]. 中国畜禽种业,2018,14(3):26-27
[31] 张涛,崔宗均,高丽娟,等. 绿汁发酵液和乳酸菌剂MMD3在不同含水率苜蓿青贮中的添加试验[J]. 中国农业大学学报,2004,9(5):32-37
[32] 赵庆杰,原现军,郭刚,等. 添加糖蜜和乳酸菌制剂对西藏青稞秸秆和多年生黑麦草混合青贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 草业学报,2014,23(4):100-106
[33] OHMOMO S,TANAKA O,KITAMOTO H K,et al. Silage and microbial performance,old story but new problems[J]. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly,2002,36(2):59-71
[34] 孙宇,祖晓伟,韩旭,等. 不同添加剂对苜蓿与花生秧混合青贮体外发酵特性的影响[J]. 饲料工业,2023,44(21):7-13
[35] 华世旋,陈艳萍,黑银川,等. 不同添加剂对杂交构树青贮饲料营养成分和发酵品质、能量及体外消化率的影响[J]. 现代畜牧科技,2023(6):42-45

Effects of Different Additives on Silage Quality of Chinese Medicine Residue

不同添加剂对中药渣青贮品质的影响

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	YANG Dan, WU Shuo, CHEN Dan-dan, ZHANG Qing. Determination of the Active Components of Essential Oil in Neolamarckia cadamba and Its Effect on the Aerobic Stabilization of Whole Plant Corn Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(9): 2860-2867.
[2]	REN Yong-xia, YANG Guan-gen, REN Meng-yu, LI Yi-ran, ZHANG Si-qi, SU Yu-ting, SHANG Ai-min, ZHANG Jia-yin, GUO Yu-pin. Effects of Mix-ensiling Silage Ratio and Additives on the Mixed Silage Quality of Broccoli Residues [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(9): 2868-2874.
[3]	YAN Xu, WU Zi-zhou, ZUO Yan-chun, WANG Hong-lin, WANG Qiang-feng, LI Yang, KOU Jing, DU Zhou-he. Silage Characteristics of Different Corn Plant Parts and Strategies for Improving Their Silage Quality [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(8): 2275-2286.
[4]	SHE Zhi-hui, CAO Xi-min, YU Feng-fang, XU Zhan-yun, LIU Gui-he, LYU Ai-zhi. Selection of Silage Maize Varieties (or Strains) in the Agro Pastoral Ecotone of Northwest Hebei Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(8): 2409-2416.
[5]	DANG Jia-hao, LONG Shi-he, LI Xue-feng, PAN Jun-xin, WANG Jian. Isolation and Identification of Lactic Acid Bacteria Strain from Pennisetum purpureum × P. americanum ‘Reyan No.4’ Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(8): 2537-2544.
[6]	YAN Li-juan, TAN Yan, MA Wei-wei, CHANG Hai-gang, XIE Ming-jun, LU Yan-hua, ZHANG Jian-xi. Effects of Water Saving and Nitrogen Reduction on Growth and Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Silage Maize in Hexi Irrigation Area of Gansu Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(8): 2545-2553.
[7]	LIU Yi-chao, SUN Peng-bo, ZHANG Jia-wei, LI Dong-mei, MA Hong-wei, JING Zhi-wei, WANG Rui-feng, JIA Yu-shan. Effect of Fermentation Inhibitors on Quality and Aerobic Stability of Leymus chinensis Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(8): 2564-2570.
[8]	WU Ai-li, XIAO Yu, SHAO Tao, ZONG Cheng, HUANG Zhong-yong, WU Jin-xin, LIU Qin-hua, RONG Hui. Investigation on β-Carotene Loss Inhibition Mechanism by Silage Fermentation Products-Squalene [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(7): 1988-1995.
[9]	HUANG Pei-shan, ZHANG Chao, CHEN Dan-dan, ZHANG Qing. Effect of Leaf Extracts of Moringa oleracea on the Quality of Stylosanthes guianensis and Pennisetum purpureum Silages [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(7): 2194-2202.
[10]	YAN Xing-quan, JIA Yu-shan, GE Gen-tu, WANG Zhi-jun, ZHAO Mu-qi-er, LIU Jing-yi, ZHU Na, SUN Peng-bo. Effect of Raw Material Moisture Content and Additive Type on Silage Quality of Alfalfa [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(6): 1861-1866.
[11]	GAN Li, LI Hai-ping, WANG Hui, CHEN You-jun, CHEN Shi-yong, JIANG Yong-mei, ZHANG Jia-min, LIANG Ji, GUAN Hao, ZHOU Qing-ping. Effects of Growth Phase and Mixed Sowing Ratio on Silage Quality of Forage Oat/ Common Vetch Mixed Fermentation in Winter Fallow Field of Sichuan [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(6): 1867-1877.
[12]	XU Jun-zhao, WANG Qi, HU Zong-fu, WU Bai-yila, NIU Hua-xin. Effects of Different Processing Methods of Corn Straw-as a Based Rations on Growth Performance,Apparent Nutrient Digestibility,Rumen Fermentation and Microbial Composition of Beef Cattle [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(6): 1894-1901.
[13]	LI Xiao, CHEN Yong-cheng, HUANG Rong-zheng, QI Ya-yin, ZHANG Fan-fan, MA Chun-hui. Effects of Compound Starter on Silage Quality and Rumen Degradation Rate of Sunflower Byproduct [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(5): 1564-1570.
[14]	AN Jiang-bo, LIU Ming-jian, LIU Wei, BAI Bao-chao, JING Zhi-wei, WANG Rui-feng, WANG Zhi-jun, GE Gen-tu, JIA Yu-shan. Research Progress on Nitrite Transformation Pathway and its Influencing Factors in Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(4): 943-951.
[15]	FENG Qi-xian, ZHANG Lei, LI Yan, LING Wen-qing, LI Jue, ZHOU Yi, YANG Fu-lin, ZHOU Jing. Effects of Formic Acid Treatment on the Quality and Rumen Degradation Rate of Alfalfa Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(4): 1264-1272.