添加乳酸菌和纤维素酶对砂仁叶青贮品质的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.05.029

草地学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 1113-1117.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.05.029

添加乳酸菌和纤维素酶对砂仁叶青贮品质的影响

郑明扬, 吴硕, 郭香, 陈晓阳, 张庆

华南农业大学林学与风景园林学院, 广东木本饲料工程技术研究中心, 广东省森林植物种质创新与利用重点实验室, 广东广州, 510642

收稿日期:2020-11-18 修回日期:2021-01-21 出版日期:2021-05-15 发布日期:2021-06-02
通讯作者: 陈晓阳,E-mail:xychen@scau.edu.cn;张庆,E-mail:zqing1988@126.com
作者简介:郑明扬，男(1996-)，广东汕头人，硕士研究生，主要从事青贮饲料和辣木多倍体研究，E-mail: 827500258@qq.com
基金资助:
广东省林业科技创新项目（2019KJCX001，2018KJCX001）资助

Effects of Lactobacillus and Cellulase on the Silage Quality of Amomum Villosum leaves

ZHENG Ming-yang, WU Shuo, GUO Xiang, CHEN Xiao-yang, ZHANG Qing

College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangdong Research Center of Woody Forage Engineering Technology Guangzhou, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Innovation Development and Utilization of Forage Plant Germplasm, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510642, China

Received:2020-11-18 Revised:2021-01-21 Online:2021-05-15 Published:2021-06-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究添加乳酸菌（Lactobacillus farciminis，LF）以及纤维素酶对砂仁（Amomum Villosum）叶青贮品质的影响，试验将LF添加到砂仁叶青贮当中，并添加不同浓度的纤维素酶（Cellulase，C）和木聚糖酶（Xylanase，X）。采用完全随机区组试验，共10个试验组，分别为CK，0.3%C，0.6%C，0.2%X，0.4%X，CK+LF，0.3%C+LF，0.6%C+LF，0.2%X+LF和0.4%X+LF。青贮30 d后进行开袋取样测定其青贮品质和营养成分。结果表明：砂仁叶原料的纤维含量较高，可溶性碳水化合物的含量较低；添加LF和纤维素酶都极显著降低了砂仁叶青贮饲料的纤维含量和pH值；乳酸含量极显著升高（P<0.01）。LF和纤维素酶同时添加可有效提升砂仁叶的青贮品质。

关键词: 砂仁, 青贮品质, 乳酸菌, 纤维素酶

Abstract: In order to study the effects of Lactobacillus farciminis (LF) and cellulase on the silage quality of Amomum villosum leaves,Lactobacillus farciminis (LF) was added to leaves of Amomum villosum for silage,together with different concentrations of Cellulase (C) and Xylanase (X). Two-factor (cellulase×LF) was used for complete randomized trials in ten test groups,CK,0.3%C,0.6%C,0.2%X,0.4%X,CK+LF,0.3%C+LF,0.6%C+LF,0.2%X+LF and 0.4%X+LF,respectively. After 30 days of silage,the silage quality and the nutritional components were measured after opening bag and sampling. The results showed that the fiber content of Amomum villosum leaves was high and the content of water soluble carbohydrates was low. The LF or cellulase addition significantly decreased the fiber content and pH value whereas significantly increased the lactic acid content (P<0.01). The simultaneous addition of LF and cellulase effectively improved the silage quality of Amomum villosum leaves.

Key words: Amomum villosum, Silage quality, Lactic acid bacteria, Cellulase

中图分类号:

S816.5+3

郑明扬, 吴硕, 郭香, 陈晓阳, 张庆. 添加乳酸菌和纤维素酶对砂仁叶青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1113-1117.

ZHENG Ming-yang, WU Shuo, GUO Xiang, CHEN Xiao-yang, ZHANG Qing. Effects of Lactobacillus and Cellulase on the Silage Quality of Amomum Villosum leaves[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1113-1117.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.05.029

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2021/V29/I5/1113

参考文献

[1] 国家药典委员会. 中国药典(I部) [M]. 北京:化学工业出版社,2010:236-237
[2] 张丽霞,彭建明,马洁,等. 砂仁种质资源研究概况[J]. 时珍国医国药,2009,20(4):788-789
[3] 李丽丽,田文仓,刘茵,等. 砂仁中化学成分及其药理作用的研究进展[J]. 现代生物医学进展,2018,18(22):4390-4396
[4] Feng Y W,Linda L D Z,Nan K,et al. Chinese herbal formula for postprandial distress syndrome:Study protocol of a double-blinded,randomized,placebo-controlled trial[J]. European Journal of Integrative Medicine,2016,8(5):688-694
[5] Zhang T,Lu S H,Bi Q,et al. Volatile Oil from Amomi Fructus Attenuates 5-Fluorouracil-Induced Intestinal Mucositis[J]. Front Pharmacol,2017,8(9):786
[6] 付琛,陈程,周光雄,等. 阳春砂仁化学成分研究[J]. 中草药,2011,42(12):2410-2412
[7] 尹雪,魏刚,何建雄,等. 阳春砂仁GC-MS特征指纹图谱数字化信息的GC验证[J]. 中药新药与临床药理,2008(6):473-476
[8] 李乔仙,高月娥,亐开兴,等. 砂仁茎叶饲用营养价值评定[J]. 畜牧与兽医,2016,48(10):61-63
[9] 韩建成,蔺红玲,江汉青,等. 砂仁茎叶对雷州黑山羊生长性能及血液生化指标的影响[J]. 草业科学,2019,36(6):1634-1640
[10] 闫长东. 一种砂仁饲料:中国,CN206350472U[P].2017-07-25
[11] 张庆. 饲草青贮用乳酸菌的筛选及作用机理[D]. 北京：中国农业大学,2016:4-6
[12] 寇江涛,程钰,张海波,等. 不同酶制剂对水稻秸秆和白酒糟混合青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(2):396-401
[13] Lynd L R,Weimer P J,van Zyl W H,et al. Microbial cellulose utilization:fundamentals and biotechnology[J]. Microbiology and molecular biology reviews：MMBR,2002,66(3):506-577
[14] Dinić B,Ðordevi N,Radović J,et al. Trends in legumes ensilaging[J]. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry,2011,27(4):1551-1561
[15] 李毓堂. 创草产业新系统解人畜争粮矛盾确保粮食安全农畜产品有效供应[J]. 草业科学,2013,30(11):1687-1689
[16] Zhang Q,Li X,Zhao M,et al. Lactic acid bacteria strains for enhancing the fermentation quality and aerobic stability of Leymus chinensis silage[J]. Grass and Forage Science,2016,71(3):472-481
[17] 王成,王益,周玮,等. 植物乳杆菌和含水量对辣木叶青贮品质和单宁含量的影响[J]. 草业学报,2019,28(6):109-118
[18] 田瑞霞,安渊,王光文,等. 紫花苜蓿青贮过程中pH值和营养物质变化规律[J]. 草业学报,2005(3):82-86
[19] 许庆方,玉柱,韩建国,等. 高效液相色谱法测定紫花苜蓿青贮中的有机酸[J]. 草原与草坪,2007(2):63-65,67
[20] Van Soest P J,Robertson J B,Lewis B A. Methods for Dietary Fiber,Neutral Detergent Fiber,and Nonstarch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1991,74(10):3583-3597
[21] Murphy R P,Murphy R P. A method for the extraction of plant samples and the determination of total soluble carbohydrates[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1958,9(11):714-717
[22] 张丽英. 饲料分析及质量检测技术(第3版)[M]. 北京:中国农业大学出版社,2007:49-75
[23] Licitra G,Hernandez T M,Van Soest P J. Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,1996,57(4):347-358
[24] Bolsen K K,Lin C,Brent B E,et al. Effect of silage additives on the microbial succession and fermentation process of alfalfa and corn silages[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1992,75(11):3066-3083
[25] 赵苗苗,玉柱. 添加乳酸菌及纤维素酶对象草青贮品质的改善效果[J]. 草地学报,2015,23(1):205-210
[26] 刘刚,张红瑞,郭凯,等. 河南青贮玉米品种鉴选与青贮质量评价[J]. 草地学报,2019,27(2):510-514
[27] Jessie G,Vern S B,Karen A B. Corn Forage Yield and Quality for Silage in Short Growing Season Areas of the Canadian Prairies[J].Agronomy,2018,8(9):164
[28] Smith,L H. Theoretical carbohydrate requirement for alfalfa silage production[J]. Agronomy Journal,1962,54(4):291-293
[29] McDonald P,Henderson A R,Heron S J E. The Biochemisty of Silage[J]. American Journal of Cardiology,1991,29(4):578-580
[30] 李茂,字学娟,周汉林,等. 海南省部分热带灌木饲用价值评定[J]. 动物营养学报,2012,24(1):85-94
[31] Cai Y,Benno Y,Ogawa M,et al. Influence of lactobacillus spp. from An inoculant and of weissella and leuconostoc spp. from forage crops on silage fermentation[J]. Applied and environmental microbiology,1998,64(8):2982-2987
[32] Muck R E. Silage microbiology and its control through additives[J]. Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia,2010,39(supplspe):183-191
[33] McDonald P. The biochemistry of silage[M]. New York:J. Wiley,1981:1-226.
[34] Parvin S,Nishino N. Bacterial community associated with ensilage process of wilted guinea grass[J]. Journal of Applied Microbiology,2009(6):2029-2036
[35] Ebrahimi,Rajion,Goh,et al. The Effects of Adding Lactic Acid Bacteria and Cellulase in Oil Palm (Elais Guineensis Jacq.) Frond Silages on Fermentation Quality,Chemical Composition and in Vitro Digestibility[J]. Italian Journal of Animal Science,2014,13(3):3358
[36] Wang H,Ning T,Hao W,et al. Dynamics Associated with Prolonged Ensiling and Aerobic Deterioration of Total Mixed Ration Silage Containing Whole Crop Corn[J]. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences,2016(1):62-72
[37] Tabacco E,Piano S,Revello-Chion A,et al. Effect of Lactobacillus buchneri LN4637 and Lactobacillus buchneri LN40177 on the aerobic stability,fermentation products,and microbial populations of corn silage under farm conditions[J]. J Dairy Sci,2011(11):5589-5598
[38] 侯俊财,刘飞,杨丽杰,等. 添加乳酸菌对全株玉米青贮饲料品质的影响[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医,2006(2):50-52

添加乳酸菌和纤维素酶对砂仁叶青贮品质的影响

Effects of Lactobacillus and Cellulase on the Silage Quality of Amomum Villosum leaves

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	马冉冉, 袁洁, 张文洁, 许能祥, 顾洪如. 堆放时间对西兰花尾菜青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2107-2114.
[2]	陈雷, 暴雪艳, 郭刚, 霍文婕, 李清宏, 许庆方, 王聪, 刘强. 单宁酸和乳酸菌对紫花苜蓿青贮品质和体外瘤胃发酵的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1853-1858.
[3]	杜昭昌, 王红, 闫艳红, Muhammad Tahir, 韦潇, 曾泰儒, 李洪亮. 稻壳和麦麸对鲜玉米秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1549-1554.
[4]	吴硕, 邹璇, 王明亚, 张庆. 陈皮柑汁对柱花草和水稻秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1565-1570.
[5]	吕竑建, 邹璇, 吴硕, 李云, 陈晓阳, 张庆. 添加辣木叶和香肠乳杆菌对玉米秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1343-1349.
[6]	秦伟娜, 焦婷, 师尚礼, 李雄雄, 高雪梅, 赵生国, 祁娟, 王正文. 不同水热资源条件下10个青饲玉米品种的青贮品质评价[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1070-1079.
[7]	陈德奎, 郭香, 郑明扬, 陈晓阳, 周玮, 张庆. 砂仁精油对紫花苜蓿青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 855-860.
[8]	王丽学, 韩静, 陈龙宾, 余新越, 刘景喜, 马毅, 霍文娟. 不同乳酸菌组合对苜蓿青贮细菌群落结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 388-395.
[9]	寇江涛, 程钰, 张海波, 郭冬生, 雷佳星, 孟佳琪, 刘鑫, 李乐. 不同酶制剂对水稻秸秆和白酒糟混合青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 396-401.
[10]	丁浩, 吴永杰, 邵涛, 赵杰, 代童童, 董东, 尹雪敬, 贾玉山, 李君风. 纤维素酶和木聚糖酶对象草青贮发酵品质及体外消化率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2600-2608.
[11]	白春生, 佟明昊, 赵萌萌, 孙娟娟, 薛艳林, 玉柱. 施氮量和留茬高度对高丹草青贮发酵品质及饲用价值的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1421-1426.
[12]	陈堞, 林凯程, 林沁, 陈霞, 陈鑫珠. 大米草中耐盐乳酸菌的分离鉴定及对大米草青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(2): 565-570.
[13]	李龙兴, 汪依妮, 杨学东, 黎俊, 龚正发, 弗雷泽·乔治·哈里森, 陈秀华, 黄文琥, 梁显义. 凋萎和添加乳酸菌对大黑山薏苡青贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(4): 1102-1106.
[14]	穆麟, 李顺, 曾宁波, 陈桂华, 张志飞, 叶志刚. 添加糖蜜、乳酸菌制剂对籽粒苋与稻秸混合青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(2): 482-487.
[15]	周瑞, 刘立山, 郎侠, 王彩莲, 宋淑珍, 吴建平. 甜菜块根和玉米秸秆混贮营养品质及有氧暴露期微生物数量分析[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(1): 192-198.