不同添加量葡萄渣对苜蓿青贮发酵品质及CNCPS蛋白组分的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.06.035

草地学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 1986-1994.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.06.035

• 技术研发 • 上一篇

不同添加量葡萄渣对苜蓿青贮发酵品质及CNCPS蛋白组分的影响

高诚泽², 赵璐洁², 陈玮玮³, 孙鑫畅², 谢开云², 颜安², 万江春^1,2

1. 新疆农业大学草学博士后流动站, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830052;
2. 新疆农业大学草业学院/新疆草地资源与生态重点实验室, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830052;
3. 社旗县中等职业学校, 河南南阳 473399

收稿日期:2023-11-25 修回日期:2024-01-08 发布日期:2024-06-29
通讯作者: 万江春,E-mail:xjau_wjc@163.com
作者简介:高诚泽(1997-)，男，汉族，新疆乌鲁木齐人，硕士研究生，主要从事饲草料加工与利用研究，E-mail:2645024183@qq.com
基金资助:
新疆维吾尔自治区重点研发任务专项计划：优质牧草高效生产与加工关键技术集成示范(2022B02003)；新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金(2022D01A69)资助

Effects of Different Additions of Grape Pomace on the Fermentation Quality and CNCPS Protein Fractions of Alfalfa Silage

GAO Cheng-ze², ZHAO Lu-jie², CHEN Wei-wei³, SUN Xin-chang², XIE Kai-yun², YAN An², WAN Jiang-chun^1,2

1. Postdoctoral Station of Herbology of Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830052, China;
2. College of Grassland Sciences of Xinjiang Agricultural University/Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources and Ecology, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830052, China;
3. Sheqi County Secondary Vocational School, Nanyang, Henan Province 473399, China

Received:2023-11-25 Revised:2024-01-08 Published:2024-06-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究添加葡萄渣对苜蓿(Medicago sativa)青贮发酵品质及蛋白组分的影响，本试验将0，50，100和150 g·kg^-1(CK，C1，C2和C3)的葡萄渣与苜蓿进行混合青贮，在青贮的第60 d测定发酵品质和蛋白组分，第1，3，7，15，30和60 d测定青贮微生物数量和蛋白酶活性。结果表明：添加葡萄渣处理的青贮干物质、粗蛋白和乳酸含量要显著高于CK组(P＜0.05)；C3组的中性洗涤纤维、酸性洗涤纤维、pH值、氨态氮和游离氨基酸态氮含量显著低于其它处理(P＜0.05)；添加葡萄渣能降低苜蓿青贮非蛋白氮含量，增加快速降解蛋白和中速降解蛋白含量，其中添加葡萄渣的苜蓿青贮过瘤胃蛋白含量要高于CK组；添加葡萄渣对苜蓿青贮蛋白酶活性具有抑制作用。本研究表明，添加葡萄渣对苜蓿青贮品质具有改善作用，其中添加150 g·kg^-1葡萄渣较为合适。

关键词: 紫花苜蓿, 葡萄渣, 缩合单宁, CNCPS, 蛋白酶活性

Abstract: To investigate the effects of adding grape pomace on the fermentation quality and protein fraction of alfalfa silage,alfalfa mixed silage was mide by adding grape pomace at 0,50,100 and 150 g·kg^-1 (CK,C1,C2 and C3) in this experiment. The fermentation quality and protein fractions were measured at the 60 days of silaging,and the number of silage microorganisms and protease activity were measured at the 1 st,3rd,7th,15th,30th and 60th days. The results showed that the dry matter,crude protein and lactic acid contents of silage treated with grape pomace were significantly higher than those of the CK group (P＜0.05). the neutral detergent fiber,acid detergent fiber,pH,ammoniacal nitrogen and free amino acid nitrogen contents of C3 group were significantly lower than those of other treatments (P＜0.05). The addition of grape pomace could reduce the content of non-protein nitrogen of alfalfa silage and increase the content of fast-degradable and medium-degradable protein. The content of alfalfa silage with grape pomace was higher than that of CK group. The addition of grape pomace had an inhibitory effect on protease activity of alfalfa silage. Our results showed that the addition of grape pomace improves the quality of alfalfa silage,the addition of 150 g·kg^-1 grape pomace is more appropriate.

Key words: Medicago sativa, Grape pomace, Condensed tannin, CNCPS, Protease activity

中图分类号:

S816.53

高诚泽, 赵璐洁, 陈玮玮, 孙鑫畅, 谢开云, 颜安, 万江春. 不同添加量葡萄渣对苜蓿青贮发酵品质及CNCPS蛋白组分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(6): 1986-1994.

GAO Cheng-ze, ZHAO Lu-jie, CHEN Wei-wei, SUN Xin-chang, XIE Kai-yun, YAN An, WAN Jiang-chun. Effects of Different Additions of Grape Pomace on the Fermentation Quality and CNCPS Protein Fractions of Alfalfa Silage[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(6): 1986-1994.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.06.035

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2024/V32/I6/1986

参考文献

[1] 于思敏,罗永忠,康芳明,等. 干旱胁迫对紫花苜蓿生长和叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 草地学报,2023,31(6):1762-1771
[2] 张勃,柯文灿,李福厚,等. 干草防腐剂在不同规格苜蓿干草捆中的应用效果研究[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(6):1569-1575
[3] 王亚楠,李光鹏,韩红燕. 苜蓿青贮技术研究进展[J]. 中国饲料,2016(23):10-15
[4] 罗润博,张养东,郑楠,等. 苜蓿青贮品质评定研究进展[J]. 中国奶牛,2020(11):12-16
[5] 闫星全,贾玉山,格根图,等. 原料含水量及添加剂种类对青贮苜蓿品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2023,31(6):1861-1866
[6] TABACCO E,BORRENAI G,CROVETTO G M,et al. Effect of chestnut tannin on fermentation quality,proteolysis,and protein rumen degradability of alfalfa silage[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2006,89(12):4736-4746
[7] GLEN A B,BRADFORD R D,SPENCE DRIVER L. Expeller soybean meal and corn by-products versus solvent soybean meal for lactating dairy cows fed alfalfa silage as sole forage1[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1990,73(2):453-462
[8] 关于加快推进葡萄酒产业发展的指导意见[J]. 新疆维吾尔自治区人民政府公报,2022(Z1):3-9
[9] 郝小燕,牟春堂,丁娜,等. 葡萄皮渣在动物饲料中应用的研究进展[J]. 动物营养学报,2019,31(10):4427-4433
[10] MARTENS S D,KORN U,ROSCHER S,et al. Effect of tannin extracts on protein degradation during ensiling of ryegrass or lucerne[J]. Grass and Forage Science,2019,74(2):284-296
[11] LI X,TIAN J,ZHANG Q,et al. Effects of applying Lactobacillus plantarum and Chinese gallnut tannin on the dynamics of protein degradation and proteases activity in alfalfa silage[J]. Grass and Forage Science,2017,73(3):648-659
[12] WANG M S,CHEN M Y,BAI J,et al. Ensiling characteristics,in vitro rumen fermentation profile,methane emission and archaeal and protozoal community of silage prepared with alfalfa,sainfoin and their mixture[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,2022,284:115-154
[13] JAYANEGARA A,SUJARNOKO T,RIDLA M,et al. Silage quality as influenced by concentration and type of tannins present in the material ensiled:A meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition,2018,103(2):648-659
[14] COLOMBINI S,COLOMBARI G,CROVETTO G M,et al. Tannin treated lucerne silage in dairy cow feeding[J]. Italian Journal of Animal Science,2009,8(2):289-291
[15] 张海铉,霍文婕,陈雷,等. 添加剂对紫花苜蓿青贮品质及小肠可吸收氨基酸的影响[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(5):1302-1309
[16] 李平,沈益新,游明鸿,等. 葡萄渣对甜高粱青贮饲料发酵品质和有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草学,2017(S1):40-47
[17] ZHANG Q,LI X,ZHAO M,et al. Lactic acid bacteria strains for enhancing the fermentation quality and aerobic stability of Leymus chinensis silage[J]. Grass and Forage Science,2016,71(3):472-481
[18] 王旭娟. 高粱单宁测定方法研究[D]. 郑州:河南工业大学,2021:52-55
[19] 许庆方,玉柱,韩建国,等. 高效液相色谱法测定紫花苜蓿青贮中的有机酸[J]. 草原与草坪,2007(2):63-65
[20] 蒋慧. 骆驼刺与苜蓿混合青贮饲用价值综合评价[D]. 北京:中国农业大学,2017:40-42
[21] 李旭娇. 紫花苜蓿青贮饲料蛋白降解机制与调控研究[D]. 北京:中国农业大学,2018:136-142
[22] VAV SOEST P J,SNIFFEN C J,CNOOOR J D,et al. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets:I. Carbohydrate and protein avail ability[J]. Journal of Animal Science,1992,70(11):3562-3577
[23] 关皓,张明均,宋珊,等. 添加剂对不同干物质含量的多花黑麦草青贮品质的影响[J]. 草业科学,2017,34(10):2157-2163
[24] 代胜,王飞,董祥,等. 紫花苜蓿与甜高粱混合比例对发酵全混合日粮营养品质及有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 动物营养学报,2020,32(5):2306-2315
[25] 董文成,林语梵,朱鸿福,等. 不同品种葡萄渣对苜蓿青贮品质和有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草业学报,2020,29(4):129-137
[26] OGUNADE I M,JIANG Y,CERCANTES A A P,et al. Bacterial diversity and composition of alfalfa silage as analyzed by Illumina MiSeq sequencing:Effects of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and silage additives[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2017,101(3):2048-2059
[27] MAKOTO K,KITA K,YOKOTA H O. Effects of tea leaf waste of green tea,oolong tea,and black tea addition on sudangrass silage quality and in vitro gas production[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2010,84(7):721-727
[28] 李成云,袁英良,孙铁镇. 榛子叶缩合单宁对紫花苜蓿青贮品质及营养价值的影响[J]. 饲料工业,2011,32(3):16-18
[29] 刘凤丹,李世歌,张瑜,等. 添加无籽刺梨渣对多花木蓝青贮蛋白质降解的影响[J]. 饲料研究,2021,44(23):118-122
[30] 谢小来,马逢春,焦培鑫,等. 添加单宁酸对紫花苜蓿青贮品质及瘤胃体外产气量的影响[J]. 东北农业大学学报,2021,52(8):48-56
[31] ALBRECHT K A,MUCK R E. Proteolysis in ensiled forage legumes that vary in tannin concentration[J]. Crop Science,1991,31(2):464-469
[32] 侯红雁,申晨,霍文婕,等. 同型发酵乳杆菌对低水分紫花苜蓿青贮发酵品质及体外消化率的影响[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(4):835-841
[33] BERGEN W G,CASH E H,HENDERSON H E. Changes in nitrogenous compounds of the whole corn plant during ensiling and subsequent effects on dry matter intake by sheep[J]. Journal of Animal Science,1973,39(3):629-637
[34] 佟明昊,潘港,孙娟娟,等. 混合比例对苜蓿和高丹草混合青贮品质及CNCPS蛋白组分的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2022,44(2):75-81
[35] 王坚,李雪枫,郇树乾. 柱花草青贮早期发酵特性及3种植物蛋白酶活性动态研究[J]. 家畜生态学报,2021,42(10):64-68
[36] MITSUATI O,MCDONALD P. A review of the changes in nitrogenous compounds of herbage during ensilage[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1978,29(6):497-505
[37] 石长波,孙昕萌,赵钜阳,等. 单宁酸和蛋白质相互作用机制及其对蛋白质理化及功能特性影响的研究进展[J]. 食品工业科技,2022,43(14):453-460
[38] 杨智明,王琴,曲善民,等. 苜蓿青贮过程中三种酶活性动态研究[J]. 中国草地学报,2012,34(1):113-116
[39] 杨红,张庆,侯建建,等. 生物添加剂对羊草青贮饲料超微结构和纤维变化的影响[J]. 草业学报,2016,25(12):94-101
[40] MARTIN J S,MARTIN M M. Tannin assays in ecological studies Precipitation of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase by tannic acid,quebracho,and oak foliage extracts[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology,1983,9(2):285
[41] 董文卓,赵帅,张璐青,等. 一种新型复合乳酸菌剂对青贮品质及细菌群落的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2023,45(1):78-86
[42] HASKARD C A,EL-NEZAMI H S,KANKAANPAAP E,et al. Surfac binding of aflatoxin B1 by lactic acid bacteria[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2001,67(7):3086-3091
[43] YUAN X J,WEN A Y,DESTA S T,et al. Effects of four short-chain fatty acids or salts on the dynamics ofnitrogen transformations and intrinsic protease activity of alfalfa silage[J]. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture,2017,97(9):2759-2766
[44] GUO X S,ZHOU H,YU Z,et al. Changes in the distribution of nitrogen and plant enzymatic activity duringensilage of lucerne treated with different additives[J]. Grass and Forage Science,2007,62(1):35-43

不同添加量葡萄渣对苜蓿青贮发酵品质及CNCPS蛋白组分的影响

Effects of Different Additions of Grape Pomace on the Fermentation Quality and CNCPS Protein Fractions of Alfalfa Silage

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王之杰, 李明序, 张万军. 根癌农杆菌介导的紫花苜蓿遗传转化体系的优化[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(6): 1665-1671.
[2]	代先林, 马晓颖, 仝宗永, 王瑜, 李向林, 柴旭旭, 何峰. 羊尿氮对苜蓿和高羊茅混播草地生物量和氮利用的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(6): 1864-1871.
[3]	王龙然, 王伟, 蒲小剑, 魏希杰, 傅云洁, 徐成体. 青海东部干旱区不同紫花苜蓿品种饲用品质和生产性能比较[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(6): 1936-1943.
[4]	匡倩, 宗亚倩, 杨文, 黄鹤平, 何承刚, 姜华. 空间诱变对‘德钦’紫花苜蓿农艺性状和营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(6): 1962-1967.
[5]	孙铁男, 李茂娜, 陈芬, 张玉霞, 王显国. 不同灌溉下限对科尔沁沙地紫花苜蓿生产性能的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(6): 1968-1973.
[6]	代蕊, 陈崎, 爽爽, 张岩, 张志强, 米福贵. 紫花苜蓿MsJAR1基因克隆及表达分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(5): 1370-1377.
[7]	张政, 刘美君, 王婕, 赵尧尧, 安长奇, 王跳霞. 低温下紫花苜蓿叶片的光破坏防御作用[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(5): 1429-1439.
[8]	杨静, 隋晓青, 王鑫尧, 石国庆, 李浩天, 王玉祥, 吉尔尔格, 孙凌子寅, 张树振, 陈述明. 氮肥与复硝酚钠复配施用对紫花苜蓿生理特性及种子产量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(5): 1471-1478.
[9]	叶雨浓, 余淑艳, 王星, 宋文学, 王晶, 胡鹏飞, 王通锐, 高雪芹, 伏兵哲. 灌溉方式与磷素对紫花苜蓿生产性能和营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(5): 1592-1600.
[10]	黑梦琴, 曹正宇, 王志远, 代春辉, 陈程, 张文举. 添加复合乳酸菌和糖蜜对不同水分含量苜蓿青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(5): 1601-1609.
[11]	胡梦洁, 肖燕子, 姜超, 罗俊杰, 卢娜, 纳钦, 郎宇, 张健, 刘建民, 何立超, 唐佳新. 添加剂对紫花苜蓿和高丹草混合青贮品质及维生素含量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(5): 1642-1649.
[12]	陈崎, 代蕊, 张岩, 爽爽, 霍晓伟, 边林, 郭娜, 张志强, 张雨桐. 蓟马取食诱导的紫花苜蓿类黄酮生物合成基因表达分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(4): 1034-1043.
[13]	朱晨晨, 史昆, 何沁坤, 郑雨琴, 苑峰, 刘亚玲, 王赞. 混合盐碱胁迫对紫花苜蓿幼苗生理和基因表达的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(4): 1044-1054.
[14]	荣梦茹, 余如刚, 韦英铭, 王国良, 杜雪玲, 杨改梅, 高佳佳. 紫花苜蓿耐盐性相关NAC转录因子的挖掘及表达分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(4): 1055-1067.
[15]	周志东, 张煜, 李湘如, 杨世鉴, 杨菁, 谭婧, 刘莹成, 陈远其. 渍水和生物炭对紫花苜蓿幼苗生长和抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(4): 1087-1093.