豌豆蚜刺吸胁迫对不同苜蓿品种体内单宁含量及生理活性的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.02.029

›› 2011, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (2): 351-355.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.02.029

豌豆蚜刺吸胁迫对不同苜蓿品种体内单宁含量及生理活性的影响

武德功, 王森山, 刘长仲, 胡桂馨, 杜军利, 贺春贵

甘肃农业大学草业学院, 草业生态系统教育部重点实验室/中-美草地畜牧业可持续发展研究中心, 兰州, 730070

收稿日期:2010-08-05 修回日期:2011-01-11 出版日期:2011-04-15 发布日期:2011-04-15
通讯作者: 贺春贵,E-mail:Hechungui008@qq.com
作者简介:武德功(1980- ),男,河南周口人,博士研究生,研究方向为草地生物多样性,E-mail:wudegong118@163.com
基金资助:
国家科技支撑计划项目(2006BAD04A04-01);苜蓿抗蚜新品种选育(036030);甘肃省教育厅科研项目(0902-10)资助

Effects of Herbivore Stress by Acyrthosiphon pisum on the Contents of Tannin and Physiological Activity in Different Alfalfa Cultivars

WU De-gong, WANG Sen-shan, LIU Chang-zhong, HU Gui-xin, DU Jun-li, HE Chun-gui

Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem, Ministry of Education/Sino-U.S.Centers for Grazingland Ecosystem Sustainability, College of Pratacultural Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China

Received:2010-08-05 Revised:2011-01-11 Online:2011-04-15 Published:2011-04-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过对甘农5号(G5)、甘农3号(G3)、金皇后(JH)和猎人河(Hu)4种不同抗蚜苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)品种受豌豆蚜(Acyrthosiphon pisum)胁迫后其叶片内丙二醛(MDA)和单宁含量及防御性酶(超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)和过氧化物酶(POD))活性的动态变化研究,以期明确各项生理指标与抗虫性之间的关系。结果表明:在蚜虫刺吸诱导过程中,抗虫品种(G5)的MDA含量低于低抗品种(G3)和感虫品种(JH),抗虫品种和感虫品种的单宁含量高于低抗品种,感虫品种的SOD和POD活性低于抗虫品种和低抗品种,且所有品种的SOD和POD活性均表现先上升后下降的趋势,而MDA和单宁含量变化无规律。因此,MDA,SOD和POD活性的变化与苜蓿的抗蚜性密切相关,可作为苜蓿抗蚜性生理指标,而单宁与苜蓿抗蚜性的关系有待进一步研究。

关键词: 苜蓿品种, 豌豆蚜, 抗性机制, 丙二醛, 单宁, 超氧化物歧化酶, 过氧化物酶

Abstract: It is necessary to study the relationship between aphid stress and physiological activity in different alfalfa varieties for breeding of resistant alfalfa varieties and sustainable control of aphids.The dynamics of Malondialdehyde(MDA) and Tannin contents and the activities of protective enzymes(Superoxide dismutase(SOD),Peroxidase(POD)) were studied in the leaves of four alfalfa cultivars,Gannong No.5(G5),Gannong No.3(G3),Gloden Empress(JH),and Hunter River(Hu),infested by pea aphid,Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris.Results show that the MDA contents of resistant variety(G5) were lower than that of the susceptible variety(Hu) and low resistant varieties(G3) when their leaves were piercing-sucked by the aphid.The Tannin contents of resistant variety(G5) and the susceptible variety(Hu) were lower than that of the low resistant ones(G3 and JH),While the SOD and POD activities in the susceptible variety(Hu) appeared lower than that of the resistant variety(G5) and low resistant varieties(G3,JH).Throughout the period of aphid attacks,the activities of SOD and POD of all varieties rose initially then declined,whereas the dynamics of MDA and Tannin contents of four alfalfa cultivars were irregular.Therefore,under the aphid stress,the contents of MDA and the activity of SOD,POD in susceptible,low resistant and resistant varieties are closely related to the aphid-resistance of alfalfa.These biochemical markers may be used as physiological indices for aphid-resistance appraisal.However,the relationship between Tannin contents and aphid-resistance of alfalfa requires further research.

Key words: Medicago sativa varieties, Acyrthosiphon pisum, Resistance mechanism, Malondialdehyde, Tannin, Superoxide dismutase, Peroxidase

中图分类号:

武德功, 王森山, 刘长仲, 胡桂馨, 杜军利, 贺春贵. 豌豆蚜刺吸胁迫对不同苜蓿品种体内单宁含量及生理活性的影响[J]. , 2011, 19(2): 351-355.

WU De-gong, WANG Sen-shan, LIU Chang-zhong, HU Gui-xin, DU Jun-li, HE Chun-gui. Effects of Herbivore Stress by Acyrthosiphon pisum on the Contents of Tannin and Physiological Activity in Different Alfalfa Cultivars[J]. , 2011, 19(2): 351-355.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.02.029

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2011/V19/I2/351

参考文献

[1] 贺春贵.苜蓿病虫草鼠害防治[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2004.33
[2] 张新瑞,刘长仲,严林,等.苜蓿田主要节肢动物种群数量研究[J].草地学报,2007,15(6):556-560
[3] 徐林波,刘爱萍,王慧,等.龟纹瓢虫对苜蓿蚜的捕食效应[J].草地学报,2007,15(3):296-298
[4] 白文辉,刘爱萍,宋银芳,等.我国北方主要栽培牧草害虫种类的调查[J].中国草地,1990,12(5):58-60
[5] He C G,Zhang X G.Field evaluation of Lucerne(Medicago sativa L.)for resistance to aphids in northern China[J].Australian Journal of Agricultural Research,2006,57:471-475
[6] Liu Y Q,Jiang L,Sun L H,et al.Changes in some defensive enzyme activity induced by the piercing-sucking of brown plant hopper in rice[J].Journal of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology,2005,31(6):643-650
[7] Jiang M Y,Jin J H.Generation of hydroxyl radical in plants and its ration to the initiation of lipid peroxidation[J].Plant Physiology Communication,1993,29(4):300-305
[8] Bailly C,Benamar A,Corbineau F,et al.Changes in malondialdehyde content and in superoxide dismutase,catalase and glutathione reductase activities in sunflower seed as related to deterioration during accelerated aging[J].Plant Physiology,1996,97:104-110
[9] 刘玉良,米福贵,特木尔布和,等.苜蓿蓟马抗性与生理活性相关性研究[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(18):8569-9571
[10] 黄伟,贾志宽,韩清芳.蚜虫危害胁迫对不同苜蓿品种体内丙二醛含量及防御性酶活性的影响[J].生态学报,2007,27(6):2177-2183
[11] Han Y,Wang Y,Yang X Q,et al.Constitutive and induced activities of defense-related enzymes in selected wheat cultivars[J].Journal of Chemical Ecology,2009,35:176-182
[12] 兰金娜,刘长仲.苜蓿斑蚜刺吸胁迫对苜蓿幼苗的生理影响[J].植物保护,2007,33(6):74-77
[13] 刘长仲,兰金娜.苜蓿斑蚜对三个苜蓿品种幼苗氧化酶的影响[J].草地学报,2009,17(1):32-35
[14] 程璐,贺春贵,胡桂馨,等.苜蓿斑蚜为害对5种苜蓿品种(系)PAL,POD、PPO酶活性的影响[J].植物保护,2009,35(6):87-90
[15] 潘伟彬.植物单宁及其对牧草品质的影响研究进展Ⅰ.植物单宁的性质与作用[J].漳州职业技术学院学报,2008,10(3):58-61
[16] 陆宴辉,杨益众,印毅,等.棉花抗蚜性及抗性遗传机制研究进展[J].昆虫知识,2004,41(4):291-294
[17] 胡桂馨,贺春贵,王森山,等.不同苜蓿品种对牛角花齿蓟马的抗性机制初步研究[J].草业科学,2007,24(9):86-89
[18] 赵海泉.基础生物学实验指导-植物生理学分册[M].中国农业大学出版社,2008
[19] 张纵圆,李茂华,张涛.新疆紫花苜蓿单宁提取工艺优化探讨[J].生物技术,2009,19(1):61-63
[20] 刘裕强,江玲,孙立宏,等.褐飞虱刺吸诱导的水稻一些防御性酶活性的变化[J].植物生理与分子生物学学报,2005,31(6):643-650
[21] 陈巨莲,倪汉祥,丁红建,等.麦长管蚜全纯人工饲料的研制[J].中国农业科学,2000,33(3):54-59
[22] 莫建初,周丽君.油桐叶品质对油桐尺蠖生长发育的影响[J].昆虫知识,1995,32(2):100-102
[23] 赵福庚,何龙飞,罗庆云.植物逆境生理生态学[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2004.93-99
[24] Bowler C,Montagu M V,Inze D.Superoxide dismutase and stress tolerance[J].Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology,1992,43:83-116
[25] Usha Rani P,Jyothsna Y.Biochemical and enzymatic changes in rice plants as a mechanism of defense[J].Acta Physiologiae Plantarum,2010,32(4):695-701
[26] Gomes F B,de Moraes J C,dos Santos C D,et al.Resistance induction in wheat plants by silicon and aphids[J].Scientia Agricola,2005,62:547-551
[27] Bruce R J,West C A.Elicitation of lignin biosynthesis and peroxidase activity by pectic fragments in suspension cultures caster bean[J].Plant Physiology,1989,91:889-897

豌豆蚜刺吸胁迫对不同苜蓿品种体内单宁含量及生理活性的影响

Effects of Herbivore Stress by Acyrthosiphon pisum on the Contents of Tannin and Physiological Activity in Different Alfalfa Cultivars

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王文军, 刘磊, 朱碧锋, 王成之, 王含笑, 马云锡, 魏江文, 王森山. 芥子油苷对豌豆蚜生长、存活及保护酶的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1675-1681.
[2]	陈雷, 暴雪艳, 郭刚, 霍文婕, 李清宏, 许庆方, 王聪, 刘强. 单宁酸和乳酸菌对紫花苜蓿青贮品质和体外瘤胃发酵的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1853-1858.
[3]	杨艳婷, 石凤翎, 徐舶, 张雨桐, 闫伟. 苜蓿品种鉴定及其遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(4): 1060-1067.
[4]	李京蓉, 马真, 张骞, 刘泽华, 张春辉, 乔安海, 邓艳芳, 王文颖, 邵新庆, 姚步青, 黄小涛, 周华坤. 青海省6种禾本科牧草的抗寒性研究及综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(2): 405-411.
[5]	王军, 赵桂琴, 柴继宽, 王苗苗, 焦润安, 孙雷雷, 聂秀美. BYDV侵染对燕麦抗氧化防御酶、苯丙氨酸解氨酶及多酚类氧化酶的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(1): 56-63.
[6]	张伟珍, 段廷玉. AM真菌对箭筈豌豆响应豌豆蚜取食的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(6): 1518-1525.
[7]	路康, 王森山. 儿茶酚、香豆素对豌豆蚜生长发育及繁殖的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(1): 148-152.
[8]	孙文君, 唐敏, 任健, 许喆, 姜娜, 马向丽, 毕玉芬. 8份云南苜蓿属优异种质资源对铝胁迫的生理耐受响应研究[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(5): 1190-1197.
[9]	方婷, 苏浩天, 尹淑霞. 苜蓿斑点病病原菌分离鉴定及紫花苜蓿品种的抗性筛选[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(3): 697-704.
[10]	邵娅, 王森山, 叶超. 单宁酸对红、绿色型豌豆蚜生长发育及繁殖的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(4): 866-870.
[11]	田莉华, 周青平, 卢素锦, 陈有军, 魏小星, 刘文辉. 不同种类早熟禾苗期抗旱性综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(3): 561-566.
[12]	吕宁, 刘长仲. 不同抗生素对红色型豌豆蚜生长发育和繁殖的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(6): 1385-1388.
[13]	王小强, 刘长仲, 祁发鹏, 李毅恒. 吡虫啉亚致死剂量对2种色型豌豆蚜生长发育和种群参数的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(5): 1110-1116.
[14]	王森山, 朱亚灵, 宋丽雯, 达丽婷. 不同苜蓿品种对豌豆蚜田间抗性评价[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(5): 1139-1142.
[15]	韩轩, 蔡萍, 伊卫东, 韩晓亮, 徐振朋, 宛诣超. 内蒙古8份冷蒿种质资源材料抗寒性的初步研究[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(3): 669-672.