30个草坪型高羊茅品种在华北地区的适应性评价

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2012.05.029

›› 2012, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (5): 972-976.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2012.05.029

30个草坪型高羊茅品种在华北地区的适应性评价

李鸿祥¹, 李高², 戎郁萍³

1. 丹麦丹农种子股份公司北京办事处, 北京 100101;
2. 北京市颐和园管理处, 北京 100091;
3. 中国农业大学动物科技学院, 北京 100193

收稿日期:2012-03-12 修回日期:2012-04-10 出版日期:2012-10-15 发布日期:2012-11-01
通讯作者: 戎郁萍,E-mail:rongyuping@cau.edu.cn
作者简介:李鸿祥(1971-),男,内蒙古呼伦贝尔人,硕士,农艺师,主要从事草坪和牧草试验和推广,E-mail:lihongxianghome@hotmail.com
基金资助:
北京市草业科学重点实验室资助

Adaptation Evaluation of 30 Turf Type Tall Fescue Cultivars in Huabei Area

LI Hong-xiang¹, LI Gao², RONG Yu-ping³

1. DLF-Trifolium Beijing Office, Beijing 100101, China;
2. Administrative Office of the Summer Palace, Beijing 100091, China;
3. College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agriculture University, Beijing 100094, China

Received:2012-03-12 Revised:2012-04-10 Online:2012-10-15 Published:2012-11-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 华北地区夏季高温高湿影响高羊茅(Festuca arundinacea Schreb.)草坪质量。近10年来,国际上育成了较多综合性状好的抗病性草坪型高羊茅品种,虽然这些品种已在中国市场流通,但对其在华北地区的适应性及品种差异了解的不多,仅限于商品宣传。因此,为比较不同阶段育成品种的差异,方便草坪用户选择品种,在北京对30个草坪型高羊茅品种进行了5年的综合评测。结果表明:新育成品种在草坪综合质量、遗传颜色、叶片质地和抗病性方面总体优于早期育成品种。品种适应性评价的聚类分析结果将参试品种依据草坪质量划分为高中低3个类群,高草坪质量类群的典型品种主要有Banshee,Rocket,Fat Cat,Terrier,Essential,Houndog 6和Cannavaro等。

关键词: 草坪型高羊茅, 适应性评价, 抗病性, 聚类分析

Abstract: Summer high temperature and humidity seriously impact tall fescue turf quality in northern China. In the past ten years, more and higher turf quality and disease resistance turf type tall fescue cultivars have been released. However, a little is known about their adaptability and differences in Huabei region of China. To evaluate varietal adaptabilities and differences for customer selection, 30 cultivars were tested in Beijing during this five year study. Results showed that turf quality, genetic color, leaf texture and disease resistance were improved in these newer cultivars. Cluster analysis of scoring ratings divided cultivars into three groups of high, middle and low turf quality. Typical high turf quality cultivars included Banshee, Rocket, Fat Cat, Terrier, Essential, Houndog 6 and Cannavaro.

Key words: Turf type tall fescue, Adaptation evaluation, Disease resistance, Cluster analysis

中图分类号:

S688.4

李鸿祥, 李高, 戎郁萍. 30个草坪型高羊茅品种在华北地区的适应性评价[J]. , 2012, 20(5): 972-976.

LI Hong-xiang, LI Gao, RONG Yu-ping. Adaptation Evaluation of 30 Turf Type Tall Fescue Cultivars in Huabei Area[J]. , 2012, 20(5): 972-976.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2012.05.029

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2012/V20/I5/972

参考文献

[1] 王莘夫.高羊茅在我国的应用[J].牧草与饲料,1991(2):49-50
[2] 胡中华,刘师汗.草坪与地被植物[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1995:76-77
[3] Krans J V, Morris K. Determining a profile of protocols and standards used in the visual field assessment of turfgrasses: A survey of national turfgrass evaluation program-sponsored university scientists [EB/OL]. (2007-11-30)[2012-01-22]. http://ddr.nal.usda.gov/bitstream/10113/.../1/IND44030817.pdf
[4] Morris K N. A guide to NTEP turfgrass ratings [EB/OL]. (2011-03-25)[2012-01-02]. http://www.ntep.org/reports/ratings.htm
[5] 俞飞飞,程华平,李春涛.高羊茅品种试验研究[J].草业科学,1999,16(1):60-61
[6] 孙本信,张绵,韩烈保.高羊茅在中国寒冷潮湿带引种适应性的研究[J].草原与草坪,2002(1):41-43
[7] 吴佳海,尚以顺,牟琼.高羊茅草坪草在贵州南部地区的生态适应性研究[J].草业科学,2003,20(6):59-61
[8] 何霞,杨志民,徐迎春.不同高羊茅品种夏季高温季节的坪用性状研究[J].中国草地学报,2007,29(6):73-80
[9] 韩春梅,张新全,彭燕,等.高羊茅草坪的坪用价值比较[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35(5):1339-1341
[10] 谢晓蓉,李唯,刘金荣,等.21个高羊茅品种抗旱耐热性的生理评价[J].草地学报,2009,17(2):202-205
[11] Samples T J, Sorochan C J, Brilman A L. Tall fescue as turf in the United States [M]//Fribourg H A, Hannaway D B, West C P, eds. Tall fescue for the twenty-first century. WI: Madison, 2009:445-449
[12] Cowan J R. Tall fescue [J]. Advances in Agronomy,1956, 8: 283-320
[13] 余高镜,林奇田,柯庆明,等.草坪型高羊茅的研究进展与展望[J].草业科学,2005,22(7):77-82
[14] Funk C R, Dickson W K, Hurley R H. Registration of 'Rebel’ tall fescue[J]. Crop Science,1981,21:632
[15] Meyer W A, Funk C R. Progress and benefits to humanity from breeding cool-season grasses for turf [M]//Sleper D A, Asay K H, Pedersen J F, eds. Contributions from breeding forage and turf grasses. CSSA special publication number 15. CSSA. WI: Madison,1989:31-48
[16] National Turfgrass Evaluation Program. 1983 national tall fescue test. 1984-1987 data, final report [EB/OL]. (1988-06-15)[2012-01-02].http://www.ntep.org/tf.htm
[17] National Turfgrass Evaluation Program. 2001 national tall fescue test. 2002-2005 data, final report [EB/OL]. (2006-07-11)[2012-01-02]. http://www.ntep.org/tf.htm
[18] Meyer W A, Watkins E. Tall fescue [M]//Casler M D, Duncan R R, eds. Turfgrass biology, genetics, and breeding. NJ: Hoboken, 2003
[19] Watkins E, Meyer W A. Morphological characterization of turf-type tall fescue genotypes[J]. HortScience,2004,39(3):615-619

30个草坪型高羊茅品种在华北地区的适应性评价

Adaptation Evaluation of 30 Turf Type Tall Fescue Cultivars in Huabei Area

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张荟荟, 梁维维, 张学洲, 阿斯娅·曼力克, 朱昊, 魏鹏, 康帅, 李学森. 新疆野生老芒麦种质资源形态及生长特性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 701-708.
[2]	梁国玲, 刘文辉, 马祥. 590份皮燕麦种质资源穗部性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 495-503.
[3]	张琦, 魏臻武, 闫天芳, 耿小丽. 燕麦种质资源农艺性状遗传多样性的鉴定评价[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 309-316.
[4]	魏少萍, 李景峰, 梁鹏飞, 陈洁, 刘鑫, 南丽丽. 红豆草种子形态和营养成分遗传变异分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2530-2537.
[5]	乔永刚, 王勇飞, 曹亚萍, 贺嘉欣, 贾孟君, 李政, 张鑫瑞, 宋芸. 13种蒲公英属植物核型似近系数聚类分析[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(1): 285-290.
[6]	耿小丽, 韩天虎, 张少平, 李德明, 刘乾, 武慧娟. 30个燕麦品种(品系)在甘肃天祝地区的适应性评价[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(6): 1743-1750.
[7]	赵思腾, 师尚礼, 陈建纲, 陈鑫, 何佳. 陇中旱作区不同轮作方式对土壤碳、氮含量及酶活性的影响特征[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(4): 817-824.
[8]	方婷, 苏浩天, 尹淑霞. 苜蓿斑点病病原菌分离鉴定及紫花苜蓿品种的抗性筛选[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(3): 697-704.
[9]	柴继宽, 慕平, 赵桂琴, 曾亮, 贾志锋, 苟智强. 青海省不同地区燕麦田杂草组成及群落特征[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(2): 306-311.
[10]	郑敏娜, 梁秀芝, 李荫藩, 韩志顺, 康佳惠, 陈燕妮. 晋北盐碱区不同种植年限人工紫花苜蓿草地土壤质量的评价[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(4): 888-892.
[11]	梁巧兰, 魏列新, 张娜, 徐秉良. 三种化学物质诱导白三叶草叶斑病抗性的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(3): 590-597.
[12]	马甲强, 袁庆华, 王瑜, 苗丽宏. 苜蓿种质材料对亚麻刺盘孢的室内抗性评价[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(3): 604-611.
[13]	张永亮, 骆秀梅, 刘鹏, 刘杨. 22份虉草种质资源遗传多样性的ISSR分析[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(2): 366-372.
[14]	牛奎举, 金小煜, 李慧萍, 徐海鹏, 金宁, 马晖玲. 甘肃野生草地早熟禾萌发期抗旱性鉴定与评价[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(5): 1041-1049.
[15]	张衷华, 王化, 唐中华, 聂思铭, 赵龙, 赵冬梅, 梁正伟. 松嫩草地不同降水区土壤盐碱化程度与羊草生产力关系的比较研究[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(3): 590-597.