基于三种分子标记的栽培金鸡菊遗传多样性及亲缘关系分析

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.11.009

草地学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (11): 2922-2936.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.11.009

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

基于三种分子标记的栽培金鸡菊遗传多样性及亲缘关系分析

孙浩男¹, 李蓉¹, 王鑫¹, 周欣莹¹, 李明阳¹, 刘冬云¹, 李鹤²

1. 河北农业大学园林与旅游学院, 河北保定 071000;
2. 天津泰达园艺有限公司, 天津 300000

收稿日期:2022-05-12 修回日期:2022-07-02 发布日期:2022-12-02
通讯作者: 刘冬云,E-mail:liudongyun0505@163.com;李鹤,E-mail:liheass@163.com
作者简介:孙浩男(1995-)，男，汉族，河北唐山人，硕士研究生，主要从事园林植物引种栽培及遗传育种研究，E-mail：641775049@qq.com
基金资助:
河北省重点研发计划项目(20326339D);现代林业学科群建设基金(XK1008601519)资助

Genetic Diversity and Relationship of Cultivated Coreopsis Based on Three Kinds of Molecular Markers

SUN Hao-nan¹, LI Rong¹, WANG Xin¹, ZHOU Xin-ying¹, LI Ming-yang¹, LIU Dong-yun¹, LI He²

1. College of Landscape and Travel, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, Hebei Province 071000, China;
2. Tianjin Taida Horticulture Co., Ltd, Tianjin 300000, China

Received:2022-05-12 Revised:2022-07-02 Published:2022-12-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用ISSR、核基因ITS2、叶绿体基因psbA-trnH和trnL-F三种分子标记对100个国内外广为种植的栽培金鸡菊(Coreopsis)种质进行遗传多样性和亲缘关系分析，以期为栽培金鸡菊的分类鉴定、育种及指纹图谱构建提供更多分子依据。结果表明：三种分子标记均显示沙漠金鸡菊与其余材料亲缘关系较远；12条ISSR引物扩增出总条带153个，多态性条带149个，多态性条带百分比为97.39%，在遗传距离为0.664处整体可划分为4类；ITS2,psbA-trnH和trnL-F序列大小分别为171bp~175bp,252bp~426bp和698bp~703bp；基于psbA-trnH和trnL-F序列的母系溯源整体可分为6类，二者合并后定义了9个单倍型，两色组和歧序组是具有特殊舌状花色的金鸡菊品种重要的母系材料，轮叶金鸡菊‘月光’和短毛金鸡菊‘虹光’等品种源于远缘杂交；ITS2序列将整体划分为5类，定义了63个单倍型，大部分单倍型只对应一个种质，ITS2序列有望作为金鸡菊品种鉴定的DNA条形码。

关键词: 金鸡菊, ISSR, psbA-trnH, trnL-F, ITS2, 遗传多样性, 亲缘关系

Abstract: This study aimed to provide a molecular basis for the taxonomic identification,parents traceability and breeding of cultivated Coreopsis. We used ISSR marker,internal transcribed spacer 2 (rDNA-ITS2) sequence,cpDNA psbA-trnH sequence,and cpDNA trnL-F to analyze the genetic diversity and relationship of 100 Coreopsis germplasms widely cultivated around the world. The results showed that:all three molecular markers showed that C. bigelovii was distantly related to other tested materials. 12 ISSR primers amplified a total of 152 bands,and 149 bands were polymorphic (PPB=97.53%,N_a=1.9739,N_e=1.4865,H=0.2886,I=0.4406). 100 Coreopsis germplasms could be divided into four groups at a genetic distance of 0.664 based on ISSR marker. The length of ITS2,psbA-trnH and trnL-F sequences we obtained were 171 bp~175 bp,252 bp~426 bp,and 698 bp~703 bp,respectively. 100 Coreopsis germplasms could be divided into six groups based on maternal traceability of psbA-trnH and trnL-F analysis,and their combination defined nine haplotypes. The MP phylogenetic tree also showed that section Calliopsis and section Eublepharis probably could be the female parents to C. verticillata ‘Moonbeam’,C. pubescens ‘Rainbow Lights’ and some Coreopsis cultivars with unique ray floret main colors. Based on NJ phylogenetic tree of ITS2,100 Coreopsis germplasms could be divided into five groups. ITS2 sequences also defined 63 haplotypes,most haplotypes contained only one Coreopsis germplasm. The ITS2 sequence can be used as a DNA barcode for the effective identification of Coreopsis garden cultivars.

Key words: Coreopsis, ISSR, pbsA-trnH, trnL-F, ITS, Genetic diversity, Genetic relationship

中图分类号:

孙浩男, 李蓉, 王鑫, 周欣莹, 李明阳, 刘冬云, 李鹤. 基于三种分子标记的栽培金鸡菊遗传多样性及亲缘关系分析[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(11): 2922-2936.

SUN Hao-nan, LI Rong, WANG Xin, ZHOU Xin-ying, LI Ming-yang, LIU Dong-yun, LI He. Genetic Diversity and Relationship of Cultivated Coreopsis Based on Three Kinds of Molecular Markers[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(11): 2922-2936.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.11.009

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2022/V30/I11/2922

参考文献

[1] COOMBS G. Coreopsis for the mid-Atlantic region[EB/OL]. https://mtcubacenter.org/research/trial-garden/,2015-11/2022-05-08
[2] 孙浩男,李明阳,刘冬云,等. 不同种(品种)金鸡菊的染色体数目鉴定及核型分析[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(11):2477-2485
[3] 中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会. 中国植物志[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1979:364
[4] SMITH S M, DENG Z. Interspecific hybridization between Coreopsis leavenworthii and Coreopsis tinctoria differently affected growth,development,and reproduction of their progeny[J]. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science,2015,140(1):27-37
[5] SMITH E B. The chromosome numbers of North American Coreopsis with phyletic interpretations[J]. Botanical Gazette,1975,136(1):78-86
[6] SMITH E B. A biosystematic survey of Coreopsis in eastern United States and Canada[J]. Sida,Contributions to Botany,1976,6(3):123-215
[7] CRAWFORD D J, MORT M E. Phylogeny of Eastern North American Coreopsis (Asteraceae-Coreopsideae):insights from nuclear and plastid sequences,and comments on character evolution[J]. American Journal of Botany,2005,92(2):330-336
[8] 陈成. 金鸡菊"柠檬汁"系列品种[J]. 中国花卉园艺,2018(4):26
[9] KORLIPARA H. Coreopsis plant named 'Pineapple Pie':US,PP22486P2[P].2012-02-07
[10] KORLIPARA H. Coreopsis plant named 'Ruby Frost':US,PP21758P2[P].2011-03-01
[11] KORLIPARA H. Coreopsis plant named 'Citrine':US,PP22478P2[P].2012-01-31
[12] PROBST D R. Coreopsis plant named 'Salsa':US,PP22129P2[P].2011-09-06
[13] PROBST D R. Coreopsis plant named 'Cosmic Eye':US,PP222601P2[P].2012-03-20
[14] PROBST D R. Coreopsis plant named 'Berry Chiffon':US,PP27414P2[P].2016-11-22
[15] PROBST D R. Coreopsis plant named 'Sophia':US,PP28572P2[P].2017-10-24
[16] PARK K Y. Coreopsis plant named 'URIGS01':US,PP28615P2[P].2017-11-07
[17] PARK K Y. Coreopsis plant named 'URIBL01':US,PP29114P3[P].2018-03-13
[18] PARK K Y. Coreopsis plant named 'URITW01':US,PP29203P3[P].2018-04-03
[19] KIM B R,PAUDEL S B,HAN A R,et al. Metabolite Profiling and fipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitory activity of Coreopsis cultivars in different mutations[J]. Plants,2021,10(8):1661
[20] BLAIR W. Coreopsis plant named 'Balupteam':US,PP28964P2[P].2018-02-13
[21] BLAIR W. Coreopsis plant named 'Super Star':US,PP30805P2[P].2019-08-13
[22] FLETCHER V. The power of yellow. Greenhouse Product News[EB/OL].https://gpnmag.com/article/the-power-of-yellow/,2021-06/2022-05-08
[23] ZENG J J,ZHOU B,WANG N. Comparing the reproductive biological characteristics of the alien invasive Coreopsis lanceolata to those of the non-invasive alien congener Coreopsis tinctoria[J]. Plant Species Biology,2021,36(3):379-389
[24] 郭运雪. 3种金鸡菊的光合生理特性及抗旱性研究[D]. 杭州:浙江农林大学,2012:47-48
[25] 胡晓龙,田绍泽,胡惠蓉. '晨光'大花金鸡菊花芽分化及光周期特性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2019,43(4):43-47
[26] HILKER C A. The use of AFLP to detect genetic differentiation within and among populations of two prairie plant species:Panicum virgatum and Coreopsis palmata[D]. Cedar Falls:University of Northern Iowa,2002:28-48
[27] CZARNECKI D M. Molecular and morphological diversity of Coreopsis leavenworthii,a Florida wildflower[D]. Gainesville:University of Florida,2006:10-15
[28] 梁玉. 外来种大花金鸡菊入侵的影响因子及遗传多样性研究[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学,2007:1-10
[29] SMITH S M. Assessing the potential effects of seed increase and interspecific hybridization on genetic diversity and fitness of Coreopsis leavenworthii[D]. Gainesville:University of Florida,2011:14-15
[30] 孙浩男,李蓉,李明阳,等. 栽培金鸡菊EST-SSR分子标记开发与亲缘关系分析[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(5):858-868
[31] 郎乾坤,樊丛照,朱军,等. 维吾尔药茶昆仑雪菊ISSR分子标记体系的建立[J]. 生物资源,2017,39(1):16-41
[32] 樊丛照,郎乾坤,朱军,等. 昆仑雪菊表型性状及分子标记的遗传多样性研究[J]. 中国现代中药,2019,21(10):1367-1371,1391
[33] MORT M E,RANDLE C P,KIMBALL R T,et al. Phylogeny of Coreopsideae (Asteraceae) inferred from nuclear and plastid DNA sequences[J]. Taxon,2008,57(1):109-120
[34] 江亚雯,孙小琴,罗火林,等. 基于ISSR标记的江西野生寒兰居群遗传多样性研究[J]. 园艺学报,2017,44(10):1993-2000
[35] KRESS W J,WURDACK K J,ZIMMER E A,et al. Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2005,102(23):8369-8374
[36] LI D Z,GAO L M,LI H T,et al. Comparative analysis of a large dataset indicates that internal transcribed spacer (ITS) should be incorporated into the core barcode for seed plants[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2011,108(49):19641-19646
[38] LI X W,YANG Y,HENRY R J,et al. Plant DNA barcoding:from gene to genome[J]. Biological Reviews,2014,90(1):157-166
[38] ZHANG N,ERICKSON D L,RAMACHANDRAN P,et al. An analysis of Echinacea chloroplast genomes:Implications for future botanical identification[J]. Scientific Reports,2017(7):26
[39] KIM S C,CRAWFORD D J,TADESSE M,et al. ITS sequences and phylogenetic relationship in Bidens and Coreopsis (Asteraceae)[J]. Systematic Botany,1999,24(2):480-493
[40] SANG T,CRAWFORD D J,STUESSY T F. Chloroplast DNA phylogeny,reticulate evolution,and biogeography of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae)[J]. American Journal of Botany,1997,84(8):1120-1136
[41] TABERLET P,GIELLY L,PAUTOU G,et al. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA[J]. Plant Molecular Biology,1991,17(5):1105-1109
[42] ISSHIKI S,IWATA N,KHAN M M R. ISSR variations in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) and related Solanum species[J]. Scientia Horticulturae,2008,117(3):186-190
[43] 王浩,黄智林,陈涛,等. 基于ITS序列的中国樱桃、欧洲甜樱桃和毛樱桃种内遗传多样性及种间关系分析[J]. 园艺学报,2018,45(1):126-138
[44] 王谈笑. 基于ITS、trnL-F、rpl16序列分析火石花的亲缘关系[D]. 昆明:昆明理工大学,2017:13-20
[45] 刘一心. 基于叶绿体基因标记的栽培百合母系溯源及百合属DNA条形码的开发[D]. 晋中:山西农业大学,2019:11-33
[46] SMITH E B. Phyletic trends in section Eublepharis and Calliopsis of the genus Coreopsis (Compositae)[J]. American Journal of Botany,1983,70(4):549-554
[47] ARCHIBALD J K,MORT M E,CRAWFORD D J,et al. Life history affects the evolution of reproductive isolation among species of Coreopsis (Asterceae)[J]. Evolution,2005,59(11):2362-2369
[48] ZENG J J,XIAO Y A,SUN M,et al. Effect of clonal growth on mating system of invasive plant Coreopsis lanceolata[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research,2010,34(5):650-654
[49] DOEBLEY J F,GAUT B S,SMITH B D. The molecular genetics of crop domestication[J]. Cell,2006,127(7):1309-1321
[50] 石颜通,周波,张秀新,等. 牡丹89个不同种源品种遗传多样性和亲缘关系分析[J]. 园艺学报,2012,39(12):2499-2506
[51] 吴志祥,聂京涛,曹娴,等. 利用ISSR对矮牵牛品种遗传多样性的聚类分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报(农业科学版),2012,30(3):36-44
[52] 刘昕. 萱草属植物遗传多样性的ISSR分析及指纹图谱的初步构建[D]. 长春:吉林农业大学,2014:22-33
[53] RIESEBERG L H,SOLTIS D E. Phylogenetic consequences of cytoplasmic gene flow in plants[J]. American Journal of Botany,1991,5(1):65-84
[54] TAKAHASHI K,TERAI,Y,NISHIDA M,et al. Phylogenetic relationships and ancient incomplete lineage sorting among cichlid fishes in Lake Tanganyika as revealed by analysis of the insertion of retroposons[J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution,2001,18(11):2057-2066
[55] FIOR S,LI M,OXELMAN B,et al. Spatiotemporal reconstruction of the Aquilegia rapid radiation through next-generation sequencing of rapidly evolving cpDNA regions[J]. New Phytologist,2013,198(2):579-592
[56] 杜迎雪. 东亚-北美间断分布黄水枝属系统发育及叶绿体捕获事件研究[D]. 开封:河南大学,2020:1-8
[57] KORLIPARA H. Coreopsis plant named 'Autumn Blush':US,PP18184P2[P].2007-11-06
[58] KORLIPARA H. Coreopsis plant named 'Snowberry':US,PP18560P3[P].2008-03-04
[59] KORLIPARA H. Coreopsis plant named 'Cranberry Ice':US,PP19470P2[P].2008-11-18
[60] KORLIPARA H. Coreopsis plant named 'Gold Nugget':US,PP19946P2[P].2009-04-21
[61] CROON J. Coreopsis plant named 'Crème Brulée':US,PP16096P2[P].2005-11-08
[62] HOSOGAI Y. Coreopsis plant named 'Sweet Marmalade':US,PP20702P2[P].2010-02-02
[63] TADESSE M;CRAWFORD D J. The phytomelanin layer in traditional members of Bidens and Coreopsis and phylogeny of the Coreopsideae (Compositae)[J]. Nordic Journal of Botany,2014,32(1):80-91
[64] DAVIS R. Coreopsis plant named 'Rum Punch':US,PP18889P2[P].2008-01-03
[65] KORLIPARA H. Coreopsis plant named 'PR1':US,PP18502P2[P].2008-02-19
[66] SEGATTO A L A,RAMOS-FREGONEZI A M C,BONATTO S L,et al. Molecular insights into the purple-flowered ancestor of garden petunias[J]. American Journal of Botany,2014,101(1):119-127
[67] PADHYE S,CAMERON A. Coreopsis:A great all-Ameican genus[EB/OL]. https://gpnmag.com/article/coreopsis-great-all-american-genus/,2005-08/2022-05-08

基于三种分子标记的栽培金鸡菊遗传多样性及亲缘关系分析

Genetic Diversity and Relationship of Cultivated Coreopsis Based on Three Kinds of Molecular Markers

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	郑荣佳, 孔维一, 冯嘉欣, 郑轶琦, 叶刚, 沈泽宇, 刘建秀, 郭海林. 结缕草属植物表型多样性分析及优异种质筛选[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(9): 2325-2335.
[2]	张旭, 苏世平, 师微柠, Alizet Didi Dom, 马强. 不同居群红砂的遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(9): 2336-2344.
[3]	黄颖, 刘欢, 赵桂琴, 王绮玉, 罗建民, 姚瑞瑞. 自然老化和人工老化对燕麦种子萌发特性及遗传完整性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(8): 2066-2074.
[4]	马紫薇, 牛陆, 杨向东, 任伟, 杨春明, 赵寒冬, 张原宇. 油莎豆种质资源表型性状遗传多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(8): 2135-2143.
[5]	孙浩男, 李蓉, 李明阳, 郑妍, 刘志杰, 张存石, 刘冬云, 李鹤. 栽培金鸡菊EST-SSR分子标记开发与亲缘关系分析[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(6): 1430-1440.
[6]	毛培, 申书恒, 蒲军, 娄可可, 周强, 王增裕, 孙娟, 刘志鹏. 基于SCoT标记分析紫花苜蓿遗传多样性的取样数量[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1110-1121.
[7]	侯向阳, 白乌云. 基于表型性状的羊草遗传多样性评价[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(3): 631-636.
[8]	马骢毓, 韩重阳, 马赛男, 李旭旭, 蔡家邦, 汪阳, 张新全, 聂刚. 基于SSR分子标记的13个白三叶(Trifolium repens L.)品种指纹图谱构建[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1892-1899.
[9]	罗铭欣, 刘凤民, 陈纪言, 崔均涛, 张伟丽. ⁶⁰Coγ辐射柱花草M₃代的农艺性状及遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1992-2000.
[10]	梁小玉, 季杨, 胡远彬, 易军, 白史且, 张靓, 张新全. 菊苣EST-SSR分子标记开发及通用性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2081-2090.
[11]	刘凌云, 范希峰, 滕珂, 岳跃森, 常智慧, 武菊英. 苔草属植物遗传多样性研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1148-1157.
[12]	陈志祥, 罗小燕, 李拴林, 吴如月, 王文强, 丁西朋. 基于SSR标记的木豆种质资源遗传多样性与群体结构分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 904-911.
[13]	梁国玲, 刘文辉, 马祥. 590份皮燕麦种质资源穗部性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 495-503.
[14]	张琦, 魏臻武, 闫天芳, 耿小丽. 燕麦种质资源农艺性状遗传多样性的鉴定评价[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 309-316.
[15]	安明珠, 韩博, 姜华, 段新慧, 文亦芾, 周凯. 鸭茅物种起源与系统发育分析研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2637-2644.