不同禾草生长对甘肃马先蒿群落土壤养分和微生物群落的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.12.020

草地学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (12): 3750-3758.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.12.020

不同禾草生长对甘肃马先蒿群落土壤养分和微生物群落的影响

王占青^1,2, 王午志¹, 马喆¹, 陈可欣¹, 本红霞¹, 闵珂欣¹, 乔有明³

1. 青海大学生态环境工程学院, 青海西宁 810016;
2. 青海大学农牧学院, 青海西宁 810016;
3. 青海大学省部共建三江源生态与高原农牧业国家重点实验室, 青海西宁 810016

收稿日期:2023-08-28 修回日期:2023-09-15 出版日期:2023-12-15 发布日期:2024-01-03
通讯作者: 乔有明,E-mail:ymqiao@aliyun.com
作者简介:王占青(1988-)，女，汉族，青海海东人，博士，讲师，主要从事草地生态研究，E-mail：793678044@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(31760691)；高等学校学科创新引智计划(Supported by the Programme of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities)(D18013)；青海大学生态环境工程学院本科生一流本科专业建设科技创新项目(2022-stxy-B11和2022-stxy-B26)资助

Effects of Different Grass Growth on Soil Nutrients and Microbial Community of Pedicularis Kansuensis Community

WANG Zhan-qing^1,2, WANG Wu-zhi¹, MA Zhe¹, CHEN Ke-xin¹, BEN Hong-xia¹, MIN Ke-xin¹, QIAO You-ming³

1. College of Ecol-Environmental Engineering, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai Province 810016, China;
2. College of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai Province 810016, China;
3. The State Key Laboratory of Plateau Ecology and Agriculture, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai Province 810016, China

Received:2023-08-28 Revised:2023-09-15 Online:2023-12-15 Published:2024-01-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨不同禾草-土壤反馈对甘肃马先蒿(Pedicularis kansuensis)群落土壤养分及微生物群落结构组成和功能的影响，本研究以4种禾草为材料，以甘肃马先蒿为主的退化草地植物群落土壤为栽培基质，通过盆栽控制试验，分析了禾草生长对甘肃马先蒿土壤养分和微生物群落组成的影响，并采用FUNGuild和FAPROTAX工具分别对真菌和细菌群落进行功能注释分析。结果表明：与空白对照相比，不同禾草生长提高了土壤pH及铵态氮含量，使速效钾和硝态氮含量显著降低，有机质含量无显著差异。不同禾草在甘肃马先蒿土壤中生长的株高、禾草碳、氮、钾含量、土壤真菌和细菌群落的多样性指数、相对丰度因禾草种类而异。不同禾草生长对禾草养分、土壤养分和微生物群落产生直接影响，禾草养分、土壤养分和微生物群落反馈作用对禾草生物量产生影响。本研究以期为甘肃马先蒿为优势种的退化草地改良和人工草地管理提供科学依据。

关键词: 禾草种类, 禾草-土壤反馈, 土壤养分, 微生物群落

Abstract: This study was to explore the effects of different grass-soil feedback on soil nutrients and microbial community structure composition and function of Pedicularis kansuensis. In this study, four grasses were used as materials. The soils from the plant patch of P. kansuensis were used as culture substrates. A pot experiment was conducted to study the effects of grass growth on soil nutrients and microbial community composition of P. kansuensis. Functional annotation analysis was conducted on fungal and bacterial communities by using FUNGuild and FAPROTAX tools,respectively. The results showed that compared with the blank control,the growth of different grasses increased soil pH and ammonium nitrogen content,significantly reduced available potassium and nitrate nitrogen content,and had no significant difference in organic matter content. The plant height,carbon,nitrogen,potassium content,diversity index,and relative abundance of soil fungal and bacterial communities of different grasses growing in the soil of the P. kansuensis community vary depending on the type of grass. Different grass growth has a direct impact on grass nutrients,soil nutrients and microbial communities. The feedback effects of grass nutrients,soil nutrients and microbial communities have an impact on grass biomass. The results of this study can provide a scientific basis for the improvement of degraded grasslands and the management of artificial grasslands with P. kansuensis as the dominant species.

Key words: Grass species, Grass-soil feedback, Soil nutrients, Microbial community

中图分类号:

S154.1

王占青, 王午志, 马喆, 陈可欣, 本红霞, 闵珂欣, 乔有明. 不同禾草生长对甘肃马先蒿群落土壤养分和微生物群落的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(12): 3750-3758.

WANG Zhan-qing, WANG Wu-zhi, MA Zhe, CHEN Ke-xin, BEN Hong-xia, MIN Ke-xin, QIAO You-ming. Effects of Different Grass Growth on Soil Nutrients and Microbial Community of Pedicularis Kansuensis Community[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(12): 3750-3758.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.12.020

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2023/V31/I12/3750

参考文献

[1] 蒋婧,宋明华. 植物与土壤微生物在调控生态系统养分循环中的作用[J]. 植物生态学报,2010,34(8):979-988
[2] 沈仁芳,赵学强. 土壤微生物在植物获得养分中的作用[J]. 生态学报,2015,35(20):6584-6591
[3] BARDGETT R D,SMITH R S,SHIEL R S,et al. Parasitic plants indirectly regulate below-ground properties in grassland ecosystems[J]. Nature,2006,439(7079):969-972
[4] 王英逵. 松嫩草地不同功能群植物的植物-土壤反馈作用研究[D]. 长春:东北师范大学,2020:1-10
[5] 刘斯莉. 高寒草甸植物群落及稳定性对长期氮添加的适应性机制[D]. 成都:西南民族大学,2021:1-8
[6] YANG Y F,WU L W,LIN Q Y,et al. Responses of the functional structure of soil microbial community to livestock grazing in the Tibetan alpine grassland[J]. Global Change Biology,2013,19(2):637-648
[7] PENDERGAST T H,BURKE D J,CARSON W P. Belowground biotic complexity drives aboveground dynamics:A test of the soil community feedback model[J]. New Phytologist,2013,197(4):1300
[8] 周华坤,赵新全,周秉荣,等. 青海省生态学研究的现状、发展重点及其建议[J]. 青海科技,2020,27(1):12-16
[9] BEVER J D,DICKIE I A,FACELLI E,et al. Rooting theories of plant community ecology in microbial interactions[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution,2010,25(8):468-478
[10] KAISERMANN A,DE VRIES F T,GRIFFITHS R I,et al. Legacy effects of drought on plant-soil feedbacks and plant-plant interactions[J]. New phytologist,2017,11(1):5-7
[11] VAN DER PUTTEN W H,BRADFORD M A,BRINKMAN E P,et al. Where,when and how plant-soil feedback matters in a changing world[J]. Functional Ecology,2016,30(7):1109-1121
[12] VAN DER PUTTEN W H,BARDGETT R D,BEVER J D,et al. Plant-soil feedbacks:The past,the present and future challenges[J]. Journal of Ecology,2013,101(2):265-276
[13] 王珍,金轲,丁勇,等. 植物-土壤微生物反馈在草地演替过程中的作用机制[J]. 中国草地学报,2022,44(1):95-103
[14] 魏林艳. 植物-土壤反馈对物种多样性和种间关系的影响[D]. 南京:南京农业大学,2019:1-7
[15] BARTELT-RYSER J,JOSHI J,SCHMID B,et al. Soil feedbacks of plant diversity on soil microbial communities and subsequent plant growth[J]. Perspectives in plant ecology,evolution and systematics,2005,7(1):27-49
[16] 赵新全. 三江源区退化草地生态系统恢复与可持续管理[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2011:1-44
[17] QIN R,WEI J,MA L,et al. Effects of Pedicularis kansuensis Expansion on Plant Community Characteristics and Soil Nutrients in an Alpine Grassland[J]. Plants,2022,11(13):1673
[18] 全小龙,陈梦词,段中华,等. 高寒地区栽培牧草化感效应缓解初探[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(12):3326-3333
[19] 艾泽民. 黄土丘陵区撂荒演替典型草本植物-土壤反馈研究[D]. 杨凌:中国科学院大学(中国科学院教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心),2018:83-130
[20] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 第3版. 北京:中国农业出版社,2008:50-75
[21] TIAN P,LIU S,ZHAO X,et al. Past climate conditions predict the influence of nitrogen enrichment on the temperature sensitivity of soil respiration[J].Communications Earth & Environment,2021,2(1):251
[22] 曲耀冰,任慧琴,高韶勃,等. 内蒙古典型草原区四种主要物种的植物-土壤反馈作用[J]. 生态学杂志,2018,37(2):353-359
[23] 高荣庆. 亚高山草甸弃耕地恢复演替过程中植物-土壤反馈作用研究[D]. 兰州:兰州大学,2012:30-41
[24] BEZEMER T M,LAWSON C S,HEDLUND K,et al. Plant species and functional group effects on abiotic and microbial soil properties and plant-soil feedback responses in two grasslands[J]. Journal of Ecology,2006,94(5):893-904
[25] BAXENDALE C,ORWIN K H,POLY F,et al. Are plant-soil feedback responses explained by plant traits?[J]. New phytologist,2014,204(2):408-423
[26] 杨林平,苏宝兰,杨文英. 黄河首曲高寒草甸退化草地(黑土滩)恢复重建优良适宜牧草筛选试验[J]. 甘肃畜牧兽医,2016,46(11):96-98
[27] 来幸樑,师尚礼,吴芳,等. 紫花苜蓿与3种多年生禾草混播草地的土壤养分特征[J]. 草业科学,2020,37(1):52-64
[28] 吴林坤,林向民,林文雄. 根系分泌物介导下植物-土壤-微生物互作关系研究进展与展望[J]. 植物生态学报,2014,38(3):298-310
[29] 赵敏,马录花,孟宪超,等. 高寒地区人工草地演替对牧草品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2023,31(7):2155-2161
[30] EHRENFELD J G,RAVIT B,ELGERSMA K. Feedback in the plant-soil system[J]. Annual Review of Environment and Resources,2005,30(1):75-115
[31] 张杰雪,王占青,全小龙,等. 高寒地区人工草地土壤微生物群落对不同种植方式和年限的响应[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(2):270-280
[32] 杨希智,王长庭,字洪标,等. 三江源区不同建植年限人工草地土壤微生物群落结构特征[J]. 应用与环境生物学报,2015,21(2):341-349
[33] MOMMER L,COTTON T E A,RAAIJMAKERS J M,et al. Lost in diversity:The interactions between soil-borne fungi,biodiversity and plant productivity[J]. New phytologist,2018,218:542-553
[34] BELL C W,ASAO S,CALDERON F,et al. Plant nitrogen uptake drives rhizosphere bacterial community assembly during plant growth[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2015(85):170-182
[35] 王占青,张杰雪,杨雪莲,等. 高寒草甸不同斑块草地土壤微生物多样性特征研究[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(9):1916-1926
[36] 尹亚丽. 三江源区退化高寒草甸土壤-微生物互作研究[D]. 西宁:青海大学,2020:53-78
[37] YU Y,ZHENG L,ZHOU Y J,et al. Changes in soil microbial community structure and function following degradation in a temperate grassland[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology,2021,14(3):384-397
[38] 王光华,金剑,徐美娜,等. 植物、土壤及土壤管理对土壤微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 生态学杂志,2006(5):550-556

不同禾草生长对甘肃马先蒿群落土壤养分和微生物群落的影响

Effects of Different Grass Growth on Soil Nutrients and Microbial Community of Pedicularis Kansuensis Community

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	冉益倩, 周俊, 张茜彧, 范建容, 李孝龙, 马月伟. 火烧强度对西南亚热带林地土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(9): 2796-2804.
[2]	赵敏, 马录花, 孟宪超, 李以康, 周华坤. 高寒地区人工草地演替对牧草品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(7): 2155-2161.
[3]	潘森, 卜嘉玮, 甘安琪, 尚振艳, 郭丁, 杨晓霞, 董全民, 牛得草. 放牧强度对高寒草地土壤微生物胞外酶化学计量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1780-1787.
[4]	李雪杰, 陈杰, 常帅, 于红博, 张丽华, 张巧凤, 李想. 草原土壤有机质和速效养分的空间分布及主控因子分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1798-1809.
[5]	刘晶晶, 李金花, 季燕, 靳三玲, 王旭, 刁兆岩, 关潇. 辉河湿地河岸带土壤微生物群落组成与土壤理化关系[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(5): 1393-1405.
[6]	常涛, 李珊, 李以康, 徐文华, 孙建, 张中华, 马丽, 秦瑞敏, 苏洪烨, 胡雪, 阿的哈则, 袁访, 李宏林, 周华坤. 混播人工草地建植初期对黑土滩植被和土壤的恢复效果[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(5): 1546-1555.
[7]	张雪, 张春平, 杨晓霞, 刘文亭, 俞旸, 曹铨, 刘玉祯, 李彩弟, 高婕, 董全民. 草地和荒漠生态系统生物土壤结皮对土壤养分及酶活性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(3): 632-640.
[8]	李霞, 祁娟, 路欣, 独双双, 贾燕伟, 赛宁刚. 切根对5龄老芒麦根系土壤养分和微生物生物量及C，N，P化学计量特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(3): 668-675.
[9]	常涛, 张骞, 秦瑞敏, 苏洪烨, 魏晶晶, 程洪杰, 赵天悦, 邵新庆, 周华坤. 氮素配施对三江源区退化高寒草甸植被和土壤的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(3): 860-867.
[10]	贾雪杰, 游明鸿, 李达旭, 雷雄, 任小英, 熊晓兰, 杜静, 陈丽敏, 董志晓, 张建波, 马啸. 减量施肥对金花菜-水稻轮作系统中产量和土壤养分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(3): 876-883.
[11]	沈婷婷, 谭瑶, 王悦骅, 韩国栋. 荒漠草原植物和土壤碳氮养分含量对不同载畜率的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(2): 441-447.
[12]	李彩弟, 张春平, 俞旸, 杨晓霞, 杨增增, 冯斌, 张小芳, 刘玉祯, 魏琳娜, 孙彩彩, 董全民. 种植方式对青海湖流域人工草地植被和土壤养分特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(2): 471-478.
[13]	范博, 王占义, 刘鹏博, 赵向玲, 李海菁, 王成杰. 生物炭基肥和补播对荒漠草原植物群落和土壤养分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(12): 3775-3784.
[14]	陈逸凡, 云岚, 艾芊, 李楠, 姚娜, 任晓敏, 石凤翎. 苜蓿与禾草混播对海流图盐碱地土壤改良效果研究[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(10): 3203-3211.
[15]	赵芳草, 陈鸿飞, 王一昊, 董宽虎, 王常慧, 陈晓鹏. 盐渍化草地根际土壤理化性质对降水改变和氮添加的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(9): 2430-2437.