Evaluation on the Adaptability of 12 Oat Varieties in Sichuan Province

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.07.023

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (7): 2128-2136.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.07.023

Evaluation on the Adaptability of 12 Oat Varieties in Sichuan Province

PENG Jing-han¹, CHENG Ming-jun², DONG Zhi-xiao¹, LEI Xiong³, GOU Wen-long³, LIU Yue-hua¹, CHEN Shu-ming¹, TIAN Ke¹, LIU Wei¹, MA Xiao¹

1. Sichuan Agricultral University College of science and technology, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 611130, China;
2. Sichuan Pratacultural Technology Research and Promotion Center, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 611843, China;
3. Sichuan Academy of Grassland Sciences, Aba, Sichaun Province 624669, China

Received:2022-12-08 Revised:2023-01-30 Online:2023-07-15 Published:2023-08-01

12个饲用燕麦品种在四川的适应性评价分析

彭靖涵¹, 程明军², 董志晓¹, 雷雄³, 苟文龙³, 刘岳华¹, 陈书明¹, 田科¹, 刘伟¹, 马啸¹

1. 四川农业大学草业科技学院, 四川成都 611130;
2. 四川省草业技术研究推广中心, 四川成都 611843;
3. 四川省草原科学研究院, 四川阿坝 624669

通讯作者: 刘伟,E-mail:lwgrass@126.com;马啸,maroar@126.com
作者简介:彭靖涵(1999-),男,重庆人,硕士研究生,主要从事饲草种质创新与育种研究,E-mail:m17623220313@163.com
基金资助:
四川省肉牛创新团队(SCCXTD-20-13)；国家牧草产业体系阿坝试验站(CAR-34)；四川省饲草创新团队(SCCXTD-2020-16)；四川省公益性科研院所基本科研业务费项目-燕麦SNP指纹图谱开发及其种质资源遗传多样性研究共同资助

Abstract

Abstract: In order to accurately evaluate the stability and adaptability of major domestic and foreign forage oat varieties in different areas of Sichuan and the representativeness and differentiation ability of the different testing sites,the bipolt and BLUP prediction model were used to jointly analyze the yield data of 12 oat cultivars tested in five testing eco-geographical sites in 2018. The results showed that cultivar 'Sun God' and 'Charm' had a fecundity and stable yield with a high potential to be planted in a large scale in Sichuan Province. The cultivar 'shooter' achieved a high yield in Hong Yuan,Aba,and can be extensively planted in high altitude areas with similar ecological conditions. Hongya county of Meishan city has good representativeness and distinguishing power,and is an ideal place for testing trial and promotion showing of oat varieties. In this study,we objectively evaluated the adaptability of oat varieties and the representativeness and differentiation capability of the candidate sites,our results can provide a basis for the selection of the excellent oat varieties and/or testing sites for the production of high-quality oat forage in Sichuan Province.

Key words: Oat, Biplot, BLUP model, Stability, Fecundity

摘要： 为准确评价国内外主要饲用燕麦(Avena sative L.)品种在四川不同地区的稳定性和适应性及不同试点的代表性和区分能力，采用双标图和BLUP预测模型对12个燕麦参试品种对在2018年自行开展的5个区试点的产量数据进行联合分析。结果显示：'太阳神'和'魅力'具有较好的丰产性和稳产性，具有在四川省内大规模推广种植的潜力；品种'苏特'在阿坝红原具有较高的产量，可以在生态类型相似的高海拔地区推广种植；洪雅县具有较好的代表性和区分力，是理想的试点环境，可推荐作为区试验以及品种推广示范的地点。本研究客观地评价了参试燕麦品种的适应性以及试验点的代表性和区分力，可以为四川地区饲用燕麦主栽品种选择及区试点选择提供理论依据。

关键词: 燕麦, 双标图, BLUP预测模型, 适应性, 丰产性

CLC Number:

S512.6

PENG Jing-han, CHENG Ming-jun, DONG Zhi-xiao, LEI Xiong, GOU Wen-long, LIU Yue-hua, CHEN Shu-ming, TIAN Ke, LIU Wei, MA Xiao. Evaluation on the Adaptability of 12 Oat Varieties in Sichuan Province[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(7): 2128-2136.

彭靖涵, 程明军, 董志晓, 雷雄, 苟文龙, 刘岳华, 陈书明, 田科, 刘伟, 马啸. 12个饲用燕麦品种在四川的适应性评价分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(7): 2128-2136.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.07.023

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2023/V31/I7/2128

References

[1] 刘伟,贾玉山,格根图,等.燕麦青贮研究进展[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(12):3175-3183
[2] 杨晶,刘文辉,梁国玲,等.高寒地区不同燕麦品系抗倒伏相关性状分析[J]. 草业学报,2020,29(12):50-60
[3] 李颖,毛培胜. 燕麦种质资源研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学,2013,41(1):72-76
[4] 李万春. 四川饲料工业的物流发展现状及体系构建研究[J]. 饲料工业,2014,35(17):132-134
[5] 唐川江,刘伟,杨春桃,等. 四川省2021年饲草生产形势分析[J]. 四川畜牧兽医,2022,49(5):14-15,17
[6] 慕平,赵桂琴,柴继宽. 基于GGE-Biplot的甘肃省不同生态区燕麦生产性能及适应性分析[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2015,23(6):705-712
[7] 张群远,孔繁玲,廖琴,等. 作物品种区域试验的评价体系及评价方法[J]. 农业系统科学与综合研究,2000,16(2):81-86
[8] 张志芬,付晓峰,刘俊青,等. 用GGE双标图分析燕麦区域试验品系产量稳定性及试点代表性[J]. 作物学报,2010,36(8):1377-1385
[9] GAUCH H G,ZOBEL R W. Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes[J]. Crop Science,1997(37):311-326
[10] 严凯威. 双标图分析在农作物品种多点试验中的应用[J]. 作物学报,2010,36(11):1805-1819
[11] HENDERSON C R. Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model[J]. Biometrics,1975(31):423-447
[12] OLIVOTO T,LUCIO A D C,DA SILVA J A G,et al. Mean performance and stability in multi-environment trials I:Combining features of AMMI and BLUP techniques[J]. Agronomy Journal,2019,111(6):2949-2960
[13] 鲁月,张子惠,陆洲,等. 基于AMMI模型和GGE双标图对江苏省甜玉米区域试验的分析[J]. 分子植物育种,2022,20(20):6939-6946
[14] 步清,鲁月,郝德荣,等. AMMI模型和GGE双标图在江苏省糯玉米品种区域试验中的应用[J]. 分子植物育种,2022,20(22):7628-7636
[15] 臧贺藏,曹廷杰,张杰,等. 不同生态条件下小麦新品种产量的基因型与环境互作分析[J].华北农学报,2021,36(6):88-95
[16] 柳娜,曹东,王世红,等. 基于GGE双标图的甘肃春小麦区试品系稳产性和试点代表性分析[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2018,46(4):39-48
[17] 邓丽,郭敏杰,苗建利,等. 基于通径系数和GGE双标图的大粒花生综合分析[J]. 江苏农业科学,2021,49(19):129-133
[18] 崔顺立,何美敬,侯名语,等. 利用GGE双标图分析花生品质性状的基因型-环境互作[J]. 中国油料作物学报,2021,43(4):617-626
[19] 陈彩锦,张尚沛,师尚礼,等. 基于GGE双标图对苜蓿品种丰产性和稳定性综合评价[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(5):912-918
[20] 王星宇,程静,高生,等. 应用AMMI模型和GGE双标图评价裸燕麦品种在华北高寒区的适应性[J].草业学报,2022,31(12):76-84
[21] 柴继宽,慕平,赵桂琴. 8个燕麦品种在甘肃的产量稳定性及试点代表性研究[J]. 草地学报,2016,24(5):1100-1107
[22] 刘岳华. 部分饲用燕麦和青贮玉米品种在四川农区适应性评价及高产栽培技术研究[D].成都:四川农业大学,2021:25-29
[23] OLIVOTO T,ALESSANDROl D. Metan:An R package for multi-environment trial analysis[J]. Methods in Ecology and Evolution,2020(11):783-789
[24] SINGH B,DAS A,PARIHAR A K et al. Delineation of genotype-by-environment interaction foridentification and validation of resistant genotypes in mungbean to root-knot nematode (Me-loidogyne incognita) using GGE biplot[J]. Scientific Reports,2020,10(1):4108
[25] 郭敏杰,邓丽,任丽,等. 基于R语言的AMMI和GGE双标图在花生区试中的应用[J]. 花生学报,2017,46(2):24-31
[26] 罗俊,张华,邓祖湖,等. 应用GGE双标图分析甘蔗品种(系)的产量和品质性状[J]. 作物学报,2013,39(1):142-152
[27] 戴习彬,周志林,李荣德,等. 基于GGE双标图分析菜用甘薯登记品种的丰产稳产及适应性[J]. 江苏农业科学,2022,50(14):92-96
[28] 张志芬,付晓峰,刘俊青,等. 用GGE双标图分析燕麦区域试验品系产量稳定性及试点代表性[J]. 作物学报,2010,36(8):1377-1385
[29] ISIK F,HOLLAND J,MALTECCA C. Genetic data analysis for plant and animal breeding[M]. Springer International Publishing:North Carolina,2017:44-45
[30] 张海娟,王化俊,马小乐,等. 基于GGE双标图的北方大麦区试品种稳产性及试点代表性评价[J]. 麦类作物学报,2015,35(9):1250-1256
[31] BAXEVANOS D,GOULAS C,ROSSI J. et al. Separation of cotton cultivar testing sites based on representativeness and discriminating ability using GGE Biplots[J]. Agronomy Journal,2008,100(5):1230-1236
[32] 许乃银,金石桥. 应用GGE双标图筛选理想棉花区域试验点[J]. 江西棉花,2010,32(3):7-12

Evaluation on the Adaptability of 12 Oat Varieties in Sichuan Province

12个饲用燕麦品种在四川的适应性评价分析

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	LIU Dong-xia, LIU Hui, MENG Shuai, DU Jun-ying, REN Xiao-yun, LIU Gui-he. Study on the Productivity and Weed Community Dynamics of Mixed Artificial Grasslands in Agro-pastoral Area [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(7): 2086-2095.
[2]	YE Wen-xing, KONG Ling-qi. Preliminary Study on Seed Vigor Testing of Oat Seeds Based on Oxygen Sensing Technology [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(6): 1714-1719.
[3]	MAO Li-ping, SHENG Bing-yang, ZHANG Hong-bo, Ayixiemu, SHEN Yu-ying. Effects of Potassium Application on the Growth, Potassium Accumulation and Distribution in Forage Oats [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(6): 1744-1753.
[4]	HU Wei, LIANG Guo-ling, LIU Kai-qiang, LIU Wen-hui, LI Wen. Study on Lodging Resistance and Its Influencing Factors of 9 Oat Varieties in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(6): 1788-1797.
[5]	GAN Li, LI Hai-ping, WANG Hui, CHEN You-jun, CHEN Shi-yong, JIANG Yong-mei, ZHANG Jia-min, LIANG Ji, GUAN Hao, ZHOU Qing-ping. Effects of Growth Phase and Mixed Sowing Ratio on Silage Quality of Forage Oat/ Common Vetch Mixed Fermentation in Winter Fallow Field of Sichuan [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(6): 1867-1877.
[6]	NAN Ming, LI Jing, WANG Chang, LI Yong-sheng, XIANG Da-bing, JING Fang, LIU Yan-ming. Comparative Study on Yield and Quality of Spring Sowing Oat at Different Mowing Stages in Northwest Arid Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(6): 1878-1885.
[7]	GUO Chang-ying, WANG Wei, PU Xiao-jian, FU Yun-jie, WANG Long-ran, WEI Xiao-li, PENG Dan, XU Cheng-ti. Effect of Plant Row Space on the Forage Value and Soil Characteristics of Forage Oats in Alpine Regions [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(6): 1886-1893.
[8]	WANG Zhen-long, DU Jiang, NIU Yong, YAO Tuo. Screening and Growth-promoting characteristics of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria of Oat Rhizosphere in Alpine Reseeding Grassland of Zoige [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(5): 1406-1413.
[9]	WANG Bo, XIA Fang-shan, DONG Qiu-li, CEN Hui-fang, LI Yin-lin, ZHANG Jie-min. Effect of Exogenous Brassinosteroids Priming on Antioxidant Characteristics of Deteriorated Oat Seeds [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(5): 1461-1468.
[10]	WU Jing-ye, MA Lin, WU Xin-ming, SHI Yong-hong, CHEN Fei-er, WANG Xue-min, ZHAO Wei. Study on Phenotypic Genetic Diversity of 180 Feed Oat Germplasms [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(5): 1501-1510.
[11]	LI Hong-yu, WANG Ya-cong, XIA Fang-shan, WANG Bo, LI Yin-lin, ZHANG Jie-min. Response of AsA-GSH Cycles to Exogenous H₂O₂ Priming in the Embryonic Cells and Mitochondria of Oat Seeds [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(4): 1064-1070.
[12]	YANG Min, XU Shu-hua, RAO Xiong, GAO Xing-fa, XUE Wei, WU Xin-jia, YAN Yi-dan, XU Li-jun, FU Ting-fei, QIAO Zheng-lin. Evaluation of Agronomic Traits and Nutritional quality of Forage Oats in the Wumeng Mountain Cold Area [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(4): 1071-1080.
[13]	LI Jing, NAN Ming, LIU Yan-ming, ZHANG Cheng-jun, REN Sheng-lan, BIAN Fang. Comprehensive Evaluation of the Yield,Quality and Feeding Performance on Different Oat Varieties [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(4): 1089-1098.
[14]	YE Hua-wei, SUN Zong-jiu, LIU Hui-xia, Yu Bing-jie, LI Si-yuan. Effects of Grazing Exclusion on the Temporal Stability of Aboveground Biomass of Sagebrush Desert Grassland [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(4): 1163-1172.
[15]	FENG Qi-xian, ZHANG Lei, LI Yan, LING Wen-qing, LI Jue, ZHOU Yi, YANG Fu-lin, ZHOU Jing. Effects of Formic Acid Treatment on the Quality and Rumen Degradation Rate of Alfalfa Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(4): 1264-1272.