利用灰色关联度和隶属函数法评价5个'张杂谷’饲草谷子品种的营养价值

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.05.022

草地学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 1522-1528.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.05.022

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

利用灰色关联度和隶属函数法评价5个'张杂谷’饲草谷子品种的营养价值

刘春阳¹, 孙全文¹, 赵月平¹, 赵治海², 韩昱¹, 翟清霖¹, 刘婧¹, 范光宇², 吴淑琴¹

1. 河北北方学院, 河北张家口 075000;
2. 张家口市农业科学院, 河北张家口 075000

收稿日期:2023-10-08 修回日期:2023-12-27 发布日期:2024-06-01
通讯作者: 孙全文，bfxydwzx@163.com
作者简介:刘春阳(1993-)，女，汉族，河北张家口人，硕士，农艺师，主要从事动物营养研究,E-mail：Lcy5516085@163.com
基金资助:
河北省重点研发计划项目(21326607D,22326601D)资助

Evaluation of the Nutritional Value of Five millets (Setaria italica Beauv.) Varieties Using Grey Relational Analysis and Membership Function Method

LIU Chun-yang¹, SUN Quan-wen¹, ZHAO Yue-ping¹, ZHAO Zhi-hai², HAN Yu¹, ZHAI Qing-lin¹, LIU Jing¹, FAN Guang-yu², WU Shu-qin¹

1. Hebei North College, Zhangjiakou, Hebei Province 075000, China;
2. Zhangjiakou Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Zhangjiakou, Hebei Province 075000, China

Received:2023-10-08 Revised:2023-12-27 Published:2024-06-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究以'张杂谷’(Setaria italica 'Zhangzagu’)系列品种育成的5个青谷饲草品种为研究对象，通过近红外光谱法测定其营养成分、矿物质元素、氨基酸和不饱和脂肪酸等指标，采用灰色关联度分析法和隶属函数法分别对10个指标进行综合分析，旨在明确青谷品种在张家口地区的营养价值，为青谷饲草品种的科学评价提供技术支撑。结果显示，各营养价值指标的相关性排序为：酸性洗涤纤维>粗蛋白>赖氨酸>磷>蛋氨酸=钙>粗灰分>不饱和脂肪酸>相对饲喂价值>中性洗涤纤维。利用灰色关联度分析法和隶属函数法得出的最优的3个品种均为：'青谷1号’'青谷2号’和'青谷3号’。

关键词: 张杂谷’, 品种, 营养价值, 灰色关联度分析, 综合评价

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to clarify the nutritional values of different Setaria italica varieties that bred by 'Zhangzagu’ in Zhangjiakou region and to provide technical support for the scientific evaluation. In this study,five Setaria italica Beauv. varieties were selected as research materials to measure their nutritional components,minerals,amino acids and unsaturated fatty acids by near infrared spectroscopy. The total 10 indicators were comprehensively analyzed by using grey correlation analysis and membership function method,respectively. Results showed that the order of each index and nutrition value was as follows:ADF>CP>Lys>P>Met=Ca>Ash>UFA>RFV>NDF. The three best varieties were 'Qing Gu 1’'Qing Gu 2’ and 'Qing Gu 3’ according to the ranks calculated from weighted correction values and membership function method.

Key words: Zhangzagu’, Varieties, Nutritional values, Grey relational analysis, Comprehensive evaluation

中图分类号:

S515

刘春阳, 孙全文, 赵月平, 赵治海, 韩昱, 翟清霖, 刘婧, 范光宇, 吴淑琴. 利用灰色关联度和隶属函数法评价5个'张杂谷’饲草谷子品种的营养价值[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(5): 1522-1528.

LIU Chun-yang, SUN Quan-wen, ZHAO Yue-ping, ZHAO Zhi-hai, HAN Yu, ZHAI Qing-lin, LIU Jing, FAN Guang-yu, WU Shu-qin. Evaluation of the Nutritional Value of Five millets (Setaria italica Beauv.) Varieties Using Grey Relational Analysis and Membership Function Method[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(5): 1522-1528.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.05.022

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2024/V32/I5/1522

参考文献

[1] XIANG J,ZHANG M,APEA-BAH F B,et al. Hydroxycinnamic acid amide (HCAA) derivatives,flavonoid C-glycosides,phenolic acids and antioxidant properties of foxtail millet[J]. Food Chemistry,2019,295:214-223
[2] 刘靖,翟清霖,吴淑琴,等. 谷草作为粗饲料在畜牧生产中的应用[J]. 中国饲料,2022(20):5-8
[3] MCCARTNEY D,FRASER J,OHAMA A. Potential of warm-season annual forages and Brassica crops for grazing:A Canadian Review[J]. Canadian Journal of Animal Science,2009,89(4):431-440
[4] WANG J,SUN Z,WANG X,et al. Transcriptome-based analysis of key pathways relating to yield formation stage of foxtail millet under different drought stress conditions[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science,2023(13):1110910
[5] 韩昱,李素军,赵治海,等. “张杂谷”作为饲草料对动物生产及生长性能的影响[J]. 饲料博览,2018(2):20-23
[6] FENG Z,ZHAO J,NIE M,et al. Effects of exogenous auxin on yield in foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.) when applied at the grain-filling stage[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science,2023(13):1019152
[7] WU Q C,LI W J,WANG W K,et al. Foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.) silage compared peanut vine hay (Arachis hypogaea L.) exhibits greater feed efficiency via enhancing nutrient digestion and promoting rumen fermentation more efficiently in feedlotting lambs[J]. Small Ruminant Research,2022(215):106704
[8] 范光宇,刘晓婕,赵治海,等. “张杂谷”作为饲草料的转化利用分析[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学,2016,37(2):43-46
[9] 邵丽玮,李林,刘建成,等. 全株青贮张杂谷替代不同比例全株青贮玉米对奶牛产奶量和乳品质的影响[J]. 饲料工业,2019,40(3):49-53
[10] 柳迪,赵国先,马可为,等. 不同水平张杂谷对育成期坝上长尾鸡生长性能和血液抗氧化指标的影响[J]. 饲料工业,2018,39(9):27-32
[11] 赵月平,吴淑琴,孙全文,等. “张杂谷”替代部分玉米和豆粕对蛋鸡生产性能及蛋品质的影响[J]. 饲料研究,2015(12):36-38+46
[12] 杨玉增,颜国华,李杰峰,等. 张杂谷替代玉米在育肥猪中的应用研究[J]. 饲料研究,2019,42(1):41-43
[13] THAPA S,ENGELKEN R. Optimization of pelleting parameters for producing composite pellets using agricultural and agro-processing wastes by Taguchi-Grey relational analysis[J]. Carbon Resources Conversion,2020(3):104-111
[14] WANG Z,ZHANG H,WANG Y,et al. Deficit irrigation decision-making of indigowoad root based on a model coupling fuzzy theory and grey relational analysis[J]. Agricultural Water Management,2023(275):107983
[15] CHEN J,FAN S,LI S,et al. Diversity analysis of agronomic and nutritional traits of hybrid offspring of forage bermudagrass[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science,2023(14):1165707
[16] PELZER E,BAZOT M,GUICHARD L,et al. Crop management affects the performance of a winter pea-wheat intercrop[J]. Agronomy Journal,2016,108(3):1089-1100
[17] GAO X,ZHU L,SU Y. Comprehensive evaluation on salt tolerance of Sorghum bicolor at booting stage by membership function method[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture,2018,49(9):1736-1744
[18] 高雪,朱林,苏莹. 基于隶属函数法的甜高粱孕穗期耐盐性综合评价[J]. 南方农业学报,2018,49(9):1736-1744
[19] CASTILLO M S,HODGE G R. Comparison of benchtop and handheld near-infrared spectroscopy devices to determine forage nutritive value[J]. Crop Science,2020,60(6):3410-3422
[20] CUEVA S F,HARPER M,ROTH G W,et al. Effects of ensiling time on corn silage starch ruminal degradability evaluated in situ or in vitro[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2023,106(6):3961-3974
[21] LE COCQ K,HARRIS P,BELL N,et al. Comparisons of commercially available NIRS-based analyte predictions of haylage quality for equid nutrition[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,2022(283):115158
[22] PUPO M R,WALLAU M O,FERRARETTO L F. Effects of season,variety type,and trait on dry matter yield,nutrient composition,and predicted intake and milk yield of whole-plant sorghum forage[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2022,105(7):5776-5785
[23] 张兰,宋谦,马淑梅,等. 利用灰色关联度法评价12个苜蓿品种的营养价值[J]. 中国饲料,2023(9):136-140,161
[24] 周镇磊,刘建明,曹东,等.不同燕麦品种草产量、农艺性状和饲草品质的比较[J].作物杂志,2024(1):132-140
[25] CASTRO-MONTOYA J M,DICKHOEFER U. The nutritional value of tropical legume forages fed to ruminants as affected by their growth habit and fed form:A systematic review[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,2020(269):114641
[26] MOORBY J M,FRASER M D. New feeds and new feeding systems in intensive and semi-intensive forage-fed ruminant livestock systems[J]. Animal,2021(15):100297
[27] 武敬也,马琳,吴欣明,等. 180份饲用燕麦种质资源表型遗传多样性研究[J]. 草地学报,2023,31(5):1501-1510
[28] 邵丽玮,安永福,张一为,等. 体外法评价张杂谷秸秆、全株青贮张杂谷和燕麦草的营养价值[J]. 饲料工业,2020,41(3):11-16
[29] 佘智慧,曹熙敏,俞凤芳,等. 交错区青贮玉米品种(品系)筛选[J]. 草地学报,2023,31(8):2409-2416
[30] 霍路曼,李艺,杜瑞焕,等. 不同品种青贮玉米品质分析研究[J]. 饲料研究,2023(14):90-93
[31] 王运涛,杨志敏,刘建成,等. 冀西北地区21个燕麦品种生产性能与营养品质综合评价[J]. 草地学报,2020,28(5):1311-1318
[32] AKDENIZ H,HOSAFLIOGLU I,KOC A,et al. Evaluation of herbage yield and nutritive value of eight forage crop species[J]. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research,2019,17(3):5571-5581
[33] 赵明明,袁野,金敏,等. 饲料不同钙磷比对三疣梭子蟹幼蟹生长性能、矿物质沉积和能量代谢的影响[J]. 水产学报,2021,45(10):1677-1691
[34] 国政,国锦华,姚宁萍. 不同饲料种类矿物质元素对小尾寒羊生长发育评估研究[J]. 中国饲料,2022(8):58-61
[35] 王洪荣. 反刍动物氨基酸营养平衡理论及其应用[J]. 动物营养学报,2013,25(4):669-676
[36] 屠焰,刁其玉,张蓉,等. 杂交构树叶的饲用营养价值分析[J]. 草业科学,2009,26(6):136-139
[37] 吕国晓,刘婕,李会荣,等. 不同品种玉米全株常规营养成分和氨基酸的比较研究[J]. 饲料研究,2022,45(4):92-98
[38] 孙全文,韩昱,赵治海,等. 收割时期及发酵处理对张杂谷营养成分及其在奶牛瘤胃中降解率的影响[J]. 中国饲料,2018,(21):21-26
[39] 孙娟娟,阿拉木斯,赵金梅,等. 6个紫花苜蓿品种氨基酸组成分析及营养价值评价[J]. 中国农业科学,2019,52(13):2359-2367
[40] 孙亚波,边革,孙宝成,等. 苜蓿草粉比例对豁鹅蛋黄不饱和脂肪酸含量的影响[J]. 饲料工业,2011,32(21):56-59
[41] 彭舒悦,梁暖意,张延镇,等. 亚油酸水合酶生物合成微生物源羟基不饱和脂肪酸的研究进展[J]. 食品工业科技,2021,42(22):449-456
[42] 普宣宣,李秋爽,王敏,等. 不饱和脂肪酸瘤胃微生物氢化与调控奶牛泌乳性能的研究进展[J]. 中国畜牧杂志,2022,58(10):8-13
[43] 孙晓青,毛祝新,傅华,等. 牧草中脂肪酸及其影响因素[J]. 草业科学,2014,31(9):1774-1780
[44] DEWHURST R J,SCOLLAN N D,YOUELL S J,et al. Influence of species,cutting date and cutting interval on the fatty acid composition of grasses[J]. Grass and Forage Science,2001,56(1):68-74
[45] BOUFAIED H,CHOUINARD P Y,TREMBIAY G F,et al. Fatty acid in forages. I. Factors affect concentrations[J]. Canadian Journal of Animal Science,2003,83(3):179-217
[46] 查钦,周茂嫦,黄晓旭,等. 基于AHP与灰色关联度法综合评价不同半夏种质资源的差异性[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志,2020,26(5):108-116
[47] 田兵,冉雪琴,薛红,等. 贵州42种野生牧草营养价值灰色关联度分析[J]. 草业学报,2014,23(1):92-103
[48] 康健,匡彦蓓,盛捷. 10种作物秸秆的营养品质分析[J]. 草业科学,2014,31(10):1951-1956
[49] 郭兴玉,陈金沅,张跃鹏,等. 秣食豆种质资源的灰色关联度分析与综合评价[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医,2023(11):91-97

利用灰色关联度和隶属函数法评价5个'张杂谷’饲草谷子品种的营养价值

Evaluation of the Nutritional Value of Five millets (Setaria italica Beauv.) Varieties Using Grey Relational Analysis and Membership Function Method

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吕艳贞, 聂宇婷, 张昭, 崔凯伦, 闫慧芳. 紫花苜蓿种子耐贮藏性综合评价及关键指标筛选[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(4): 1131-1141.
[2]	张睿, 王婧, 徐娅玲, 刘秋旭, 李祥艳, 聂刚, 朱永群. 20份高丹草种质苗期耐镉性综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(4): 1153-1161.
[3]	吴一鸣, 崔会婷, 张昆, 李跃, 李明娜, 孙彦. 两种白颖苔草对梯度NaCl胁迫的生理生化响应及综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(3): 736-745.
[4]	杜利霞, 廖明旺, 秦士利, 张倩, 刘伟. 施氮量与行距对赖草种子产量及质量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(3): 968-976.
[5]	侯瑞虹, 杜柯, 黄伟业, 高佳荷, 刘亚玲, 石凤翎, 张志强, 唐芳. 10份不同种源野生花苜蓿材料种子萌发期抗旱性评价[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(2): 489-494.
[6]	王玲秀, 邵帅, 娄亚桦. 异时萌发对旱麦草属4种牧草生长与品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(2): 495-502.
[7]	岳丽, 山其米克, 王卉, 再吐尼古丽·库尔班, 毛红艳, 刘敏. 新疆高粱种质资源萌发期抗旱性综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(2): 553-561.
[8]	高山, 闫程铭, 万畅, 任伟, 郭兴玉, 于洪柱, 王志锋. 基于灰色关联度法和DTOPSIS法对羊草种质资源综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(2): 599-609.
[9]	张景龙, 沈益新, 刘信宝, 迟英俊. 高粱苗期耐低磷能力的综合评价及代表性评价指标筛选[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(1): 179-187.
[10]	孙伶俐, 孟翔, 谢开云, 颜安, 刘伟, 杨龙, 崔荷婷, 赵越, 褚皓清. 不同混播模式对播种当年牧草产量和营养价值的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(1): 340-348.
[11]	何纪桐, 马祥, 琚泽亮, 刘勇, 刘凯强, 马小龙, 贾志锋. 高寒区燕麦蚕豆间作比例对光合特性及地上生物量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(8): 2399-2408.
[12]	佘智慧, 曹熙敏, 俞凤芳, 徐占云, 刘贵河, 吕爱枝. 交错区青贮玉米品种(品系)筛选[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(8): 2409-2416.
[13]	石嘉琦, 刘忠宽, 王东奎, 张立锋, 于合兴, 智健飞, 李洁鑫, 李敏, 刘振宇, 谢楠, 刘惠芝. 河北滨海盐碱地14个苜蓿品种光合性能与产量性状分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(7): 2107-2115.
[14]	于思敏, 罗永忠, 康芳明, 邱应德, 李转桃. 干旱胁迫对紫花苜蓿生长和叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1762-1771.
[15]	王一博, 陈奕彤, 刘馨迪, 郭勇震, 孙娟, 张慧, 李圆圆, 郭善利. 饲用藜麦在黄河三角洲盐碱地的适应性研究与评价[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1810-1817.